Reminds me a bit of ours.
"a bit" is also ours ;)
We carry dirty things like car tires etc. down the outside stairs.
Yep, I didn’t see those at first at all. And if the hobby room and co are down there, well then that’s basically right in the living and dining area, your strongest traffic area...
I don’t know if you are aware that four people who somehow still keep everything in the basement (laundry, hobby room, decorations here and crafts there, then the handyman), this hallway-... uh... living space is basically a little pigeon hole.
We thought we want the staircase in the anteroom due to the acoustics.
The acoustics may even be secondary then. Think about it – a general statement whether good or bad doesn’t exist here. About acoustics: with such openness you should consider another upper floor layout where you can separate something.
But we are still thinking about whether it fits that way or if we go from the living area to the upper floor or not. I thought maybe someone has experience with exactly such a problem
We have the stairs without a basement from the living area. But for us that’s no problem, exactly as desired. However: we have openness, meaning an open staircase and no kids. With us, nobody has to rush past somewhere, annoy or whatever. What bothers me about your idea is this massive central installation for this staircase. You surely plan it closed? And that would be, in my opinion, somewhat toxic for an open living concept. That doesn’t fit together. If you have a central staircase that affects almost all rooms, you also have to think about the optics, acoustics, and privacy. And I wonder if you took the former into account, that it just looks completely different when it’s a closed staircase.
What bothers me most about the stairs is the line of sight from the entrance to the stairs: it is basically not existing, completely ignored and feels wrong because it’s offset.
There may be those who can’t relate to that, but such a thing makes the difference between a DIY floor plan and a professional one.
After subtracting the tall cabinets, only about 1 meter remains as a passage. I think a few centimeters more wouldn’t hurt here. Often, at least 1.1–1.2 m is recommended.
I wouldn’t turn the kitchen into a passage room at all: get rid of the pantry, but instead have a storage room accessible from the front where you can get the broom without disturbing the cook. Tupperware parties, card rounds and collective football TV then become a family affair.
I took a look at Regnauer. I’ll put it this way: the home builders put features in their show houses that have a wow and whoa effect. Some are damn expensive or just not everyday friendly. Instead of walls, they build none and generate amazement. These so equipped houses are supposed to make someone want to buy them. Then the client wants this house because of this wow effect, but the house is then cut from this effect for cost reasons. Or it’s reduced in size so that this and that can definitely still be realized. In the end a house comes out that still resembles the show house but is no longer
the one. Exactly what makes it special is missing.
Yours is already a bit more everyday-suitable: cloakroom and kitchen can be used. You can also watch TV now, where one window was left out.
I don’t see that on the upper floor. Laundry chute in the bathroom, two windows in the bedroom, one of them still above the bed...
How much is all supposed to cost?