Assessment "Fixed Price" Detached Single-Family House (Solid)

  • Erstellt am 2021-05-07 06:32:54

JennySing

2021-06-27 10:14:13
  • #1
yes, have only attached the current sketches.
 

driver55

2021-06-27 12:57:33
  • #2
That already cramps up at the entrance and therefore does not need to be pursued further.
And that after several rounds with the architect?! :rolleyes: Never, it’s hand-painted itself!
 

JennySing

2021-06-27 13:08:12
  • #3
:rolleyes:
painted by myself from the dimensioned plan, because I don't want to upload the original here. Currently at planning status K with the architect. So before continuing with such accusations, I would be interested in substantive criticism.
"Das krampft doch schon am Eingang" --> Can you please explain that in more detail?
 

driver55

2021-06-27 14:33:44
  • #4
If these are the intellectual outpourings of an architect, I would replace him. Due to this "awkwardly" positioned staircase, you have "3 stripes" each 1.1 - 1.5 m, with which you, apart from the staircase itself, can do nothing. The entrance door is placed all the way to the left against the wall, so that you don't fall on the stairs when you come in. Separating the cloakroom and the access to the kitchen/living room costs additional square meters. Dressing room :rolleyes: Utility room :rolleyes: 13.5 sqm bathroom without tub :rolleyes: and so on.
 

JennySing

2021-06-27 15:37:20
  • #5
ok thanks. That helps me to work with and think about it. I am happy to explain how it came about:

The three "stripes" emerged during the planning process:
Somewhere in the entrance area there should be a wardrobe, somewhere there has to be a staircase, and the hallway resulted not least because of the statics: In an earlier plan the staircase was integrated into the living area, meaning the wall between living and entrance, as it is planned now, did not exist then. Then there were two problems: If there is no wall in the living area, where do we put the TV? and secondly the statics, which according to the architect required a certain type of load-bearing element (wall/columns etc.).

You can see the area "that you can’t do anything with" like that, but isn’t it always like that with a wardrobe or a hallway? The wardrobe is 1.65 m wide, which corresponds to about 65 cm + 1 m of movement space in front. That should actually be usual.

The front door is exactly on the left wall for the reason you described: So that you don’t run into the stairs. You can certainly move the door a few cm to the right so that it can open further. Is that the problem you have with it? Or what else bothers you about it being on the left?
An alternative would ultimately be to make the hallway area wider if the door on the one hand is not supposed to lead to the stairs and at the same time should not be so far to the left. But then you lose even more space to the hallway. Or do you have another arrangement in mind?

In the bathroom – shame on me – I actually forgot to transfer the bathtub when tracing. It is located on the "upside down T"/the wall to the shower and toilet.

With the dressing room and the utility room you are probably bothered by the "tube-like" character?! I can’t really disagree with you there. Especially in the utility room, as mentioned in some previous posts, I am considering whether we should design it L-shaped by moving the wall and turning the stairwell 90° to the left. Currently we think that in the utility room wall space is more important than floor space when you want to place the usual suspects (washing machine, dryer, heat pump, inverter, electricity/water/internet connection, network distributor, control cabinet, fuse box)... in the end surely both are needed of course. And therefore we wouldn’t have the biggest concerns about the current "tube" either.

In an earlier plan we had a more square room in the dressing room with closet space on both sides for a while. Because of the floor plan and the position of the stairs, the current room shape and position resulted. The space is certainly not used very efficiently; no question.

And yes, if it were possible, my husband would have already long since changed the architect. He gets mad every time something new is presented to us and changes are made that were never agreed upon. Unfortunately, we are tied to the architect through the general contractor if we want the plot.
 

11ant

2021-06-27 21:27:50
  • #6
Hey, who's poaching in my drawing assistant insult territory?!
 

Similar topics
13.11.2013Do you absolutely need an architect?10
16.12.2013Pre-planning with the architect - is having your own floor plan sensible?18
29.01.2014City villa floor plan / Feedback on static analysis, arrangement28
06.01.2015Where to place the staircase? Attic conversion hip-roof bungalow19
08.01.2018Stairs in the hallway, the floor plan is actually already done :o(20
07.03.2015What should be considered when designing stairs / differences in the winding?22
16.03.2015House entrance with hallway or without15
26.06.2015Floor plan question, stairs, window, orientation12
27.08.20152 full floors, passage to garage, utility room under stairs25
11.12.2015Question about floor plan, especially stairs13
15.02.2016necessary staircase23
11.02.2016Windows / Doors / Wardrobe13
02.05.2016Staircase floor plan design, tread and stringer21
30.04.2016Planning our single-family house - What do you think about the design?56
12.07.2016Floor plan question, garage, stairs33
17.10.2017Single-family house approx. 150 sqm floor plan - How to plan the staircase?65
24.09.2018City villa with straight staircase, open modern design, 140m²18
02.07.2018Stairs in the living room as a hype - Pros & Cons?26
30.08.2019Floor plan design: Is the hallway on the ground floor wide enough?57
01.07.2023Layout question: Replace straight staircase with L-shaped staircase31

Oben