Small plot, small driveway - space needed to turn around

11ant:
No, we can manage the building encumbrance.
Just for understanding. The white area is neither ours nor the property of the front house. It leads the driveway directly 3 meters past the left house to ours.

A fence is not planned.
Basically, the driveway belongs to both. We are only saving the third parcel and the building encumbrance. Of course with a right of way.
I had also thought about the "appene Ecke". But isn’t that very bad due to the statics, since the greatest load is precisely at the corners? Otherwise, that would of course also be a great solution.

Hanghaus2023, I think that's too much for us. As I said, we would like to still have a decent garden on the east side, since the terrace will clearly dominate the south area.

Nida35a: It is probably not just this curve (swept path), but around the turn a diagonal from the start to the end of the curve (so a few more square meters). The few extra square meters are definitely supposed to ensure that you can easily back into the garage and also it’s not a bad idea to have a bit of paved area for playing, etc. (but as I said, not too much).

But the idea with the rounded corner at the top left would of course also be great if you could even drive forwards into the garage and then back out. I might have to ask the architect if that is feasible.

Just for understanding. The white area is neither ours nor the property of the front house. The driveway leads directly 3 meters past the left house to ours. [...]

I will not squeeze out of you, not even in tiny bits up to page 42 of this thread, what is still missing here due to your, let's say, information policy, in order to be able to advise properly. With some advice-seekers in forums, I’m honestly glad they don’t end up as paying customers with me ;-)

I had already thought of the "cut corner." But isn’t that very bad because of the statics, since the greatest load is right at the corners?

With the cut corner, you gain two, so you effectively have one more than before. Your assumptions (and the error portion in them) are not ascertainable due to the above. But even if you probably don’t do it just to annoy those helping, it is too exhausting for me to "work" like this. That is not good for my work/joy balance ;-(

How the OP here merrily crosses boundaries, rounds off corners of other properties and apparently decides on building encumbrances themselves – I just can't keep up anymore. What usage rights are there here in black and white, how big is the house exactly, can you still save sqm with a basement and would, for example, a house rotation be allowed with a pure east garden?

The front house does not exist yet and the property was just purchased together with the front party. The question of exactly where we will make the division is therefore currently up in the air. So there is still a lot possible.

A purely east-facing garden would not be so nice because there are tall trees there. Hence the idea that we have the terrace on the south side and pure lawn rather towards the east. Approximately 150m2 over 2.5 floors are planned (and also permitted), so that we build compactly and still have as much of the property as possible.

I will definitely take the gained corner with me.

2.5 stories in a tight space - one quickly tends to build a tower. Is the plot level or is there a slope? What exterior dimensions are shown in your sketch?

We were thinking of about 75 m² on the ground floor and first floor, and then a study + storage space in the attic. It would then be roughly a bit over 9 meters. Do you think that is already too high for such a small area?