111ant 2020-04-17 14:24:05#1 He means: Clear case of de facto building boundaries. My skepticism was related to the focus on the parcels of land - I would rather derive a de facto building boundary from building edges or depths (?)
He means: Clear case of de facto building boundaries. My skepticism was related to the focus on the parcels of land - I would rather derive a de facto building boundary from building edges or depths (?)
EEscroda 2020-04-17 18:09:37#2 My skepticism was related to the fixation on the land parcels - I would rather derive an actual building boundary from building edges or depths (?) In the end, it basically comes down to the same thing here: The actual building boundaries only allow the development of the street-side land parcel.
My skepticism was related to the fixation on the land parcels - I would rather derive an actual building boundary from building edges or depths (?) In the end, it basically comes down to the same thing here: The actual building boundaries only allow the development of the street-side land parcel.