Plot selection in the new development area for single-family house - ranking

19, 20, 22, 17 would probably be my order.

How would you assess 13 or 14 respectively, or why wouldn’t you include them on the list? They are comparable in terms of location in the area, have the advantage of fewer direct neighbors than the ones you mentioned, but the disadvantage of more street frontage. Anything else that would argue against them?

Does anyone have an opinion on 31, which is offered as a single-family house plot at the very south? From the location point of view, it would be top in our opinion, but with 372m² and about 15m (width) by 25m (length) for a single-family house without a basement, it is presumably tight and therefore more complicated to develop sensibly.

How would you rate 13 or 14, or why wouldn’t you have included them on the list?

Well, I’m not really a fan of corner plots. I lived in one as a child. First of all, we had a huge hedge that had to be trimmed regularly. Besides, I always find it busy because of the traffic and pedestrians, no matter how tall the hedge was. I would also not prefer 14 because of the terrace’s east-facing position. The 31 would be too tiny for me. Even if everything still looks good on the plan, in reality the neighbors get closer the fewer square meters there are. It’s almost like a semi-detached house then. But if there are so many applicants – you can make a pretty home out of almost any plot.

Several posts with questions about the awarding procedure have gathered here, which I would gladly like to address.

Everything is also on page 2 of the homepage, if one takes the trouble to read it through if interested before asking questions.

would "E/D" also be developable, i.e., only for a semi-detached house if the neighbor wants a semi-detached house.

This assumption too, if it is kindly declared as an assumption or personal opinion, is "explained" there. The plots are explicitly declared as single-family house or semi-detached house plots. Even if there is a development plan, there is also a design framework.

Whoever submits their building application first practically takes the buyer of the other half-plot hostage.

But yes, people who are against everything and want to call it that, should perhaps stay away from residential areas. Everyone else can agree instead of letting themselves be held hostage. Of course, the situation can also be stirred up negatively.

If the municipality were aware of the problem, it would only allow "team applications" for all E/D plots.

Don’t always paint everything so black: just because something can happen in theory. It is also very unlikely because still – and that is a good thing – there are people sitting at the other end of the table and not only AI. Something is also written regarding such applications. In bold and repeated.

Does anyone have an opinion on plot 31, which is offered as a single-family house plot far south? From the location, it would be top in our view, but with 372 m² and about 15 m (width) by 25 m (length) for a single-family house without a basement probably tight and thus more complicated to sensibly develop.

Depends. Personally, I find it quite special, as I said at the beginning: the green strip gives an optical extension of the plot. However, here in the forum TEs often imagine from a “single-family house without a basement” a classic city villa with double garage and the wish for a large soccer field, plus room for a workshop, etc. Then I of course advise against it.
Personally, I consider 19, 20, 21, and 22 the best.
17 suffers from the traffic on Luikumer Street; with 16, the RVs are also parked in the turning bay.
Corner plots require double maintenance with sweeping obligations (snow, dirt).
With 21, you can be lucky that you won’t have to pay for a fence because the others, whether they have to or not, will put up a fence before you say a word.
And whether you will have an asshole living next door can only be influenced by immediately offering comradeship. One is (somewhat) less stupid to comrades than to strangers.
Since the multi-family house in the west turns out to be the mentioned row houses for me, I would have no problem taking the plots opposite there, as I personally like and appreciate the row house order.
Ultimately, you must know your preferences: even a loner may possibly like to live for himself but inside the bosom; some love the compulsion to keep healthy by shoveling snow early in the morning, and others don’t think about it at all and manage all the better. Personally, I am also unconsciously guided by orientation, that is, my gut feeling. Go there, stand on the meadow, and try to feel something.

Many of the considerations here are based on external influences that you have no control over.
You can get 2 absolute idiots as neighbors on the corner lot and 5 super nice neighbors on the circled lot. Or vice versa. Or a mix.

The moped gang at the turning area can establish itself or not.

The building area can get massive through traffic due to later expansions or not.

By the way, you will have massive car congestion daily in front of the daycare, I can guarantee that from my own experience. There is traffic chaos in front of every daycare at 8:00 and 15:30.

Focus on the things you have control over yourself.

Does anyone have an opinion on number 31, which is being offered as a single-family house plot far in the south?

yes, I already said that I think it's good.

You can get 2 absolute idiots as neighbors on the corner plot and 5 super nice neighbors on the circled plot. Or the other way around. Or a mix.

That's 100% true. The only person you (hopefully) know well beforehand is yourself and the experience whether you tend to have conflicts with others more often or less often. That would be the parameter for me when choosing.

We lived for 18 years in a mid-terrace house with small plots in a settlement in the commuter belt of Düsseldorf. 2 direct neighbors at the fence, at the end of the garden a very narrow path for garden waste transport, on which 3 neighbors opposite and another household two houses further down our row were connected. No one wanted to quarrel, even though lifestyle habits and gardening wishes were quite different. We became very good friends with the neighbors to the right and even after we moved out almost 6 years ago we still have great contact regularly. That was good.

You often hear about neighborhood disputes and they can really become a big burden – in real life, however, peaceful coexistence is rather the rule and a common goal.

Does anyone have an opinion on number 31, which is offered as a single-family house plot far in the south? From the location perspective, it would be top for us, but with 372m² and about 15m (width) by 25m (length) for a single-family house without a basement, it is probably tight and therefore more complicated to meaningfully develop.

I already said about this: I would find it problematic here that it is formally classified as E/D (the development plan has higher authority than the exposé).