Opinions on the single-family house with a "hobby economic annex"

  • Erstellt am 2015-07-15 12:15:18

Barossi

2015-07-24 12:29:55
  • #1


Hello Yvonne, the changes are rather minimal, aren't they? I don't find that so bad, do I?

As already mentioned, we find the first implementation by our architect very successful. The second meeting is coming up, and we think it's only right to make some corrections.

Best regards, Barossi
 

ypg

2015-07-24 13:21:44
  • #2
If a kitchen island is desired, it requires more space than your kitchen currently provides, therefore the width of the kitchen must be changed, the depth adjusted, and consequently the other rooms will change accordingly.
 

Barossi

2015-07-24 14:02:19
  • #3


Hello Yvonne,
then the house might become 1m longer, that wouldn’t be a problem. Then the master area upstairs will also grow.

Our architect said: bigger is always possible, his suggestion was just the base for now.

Best regards, Barossi
 

Jochen104

2015-07-24 14:08:31
  • #4
If you want to do it (cleaning) and your wallet can handle it. Why not?!? ;)
 

ypg

2015-07-24 15:53:31
  • #5
I took another look at the kitchen area: an estimated 2.20 meters would need to be widened to 4.20 meters for a comfortable island (2 x 1.20 meter passage, 1.80 meter island). With a house width of approximately 9 meters, that would mean an additional 18 square meters.
A 4.15 meter width of the living room is also quite narrow with a sofa about 3 meters wide, if the free meter is intended to serve as the main traffic route to the kitchen. Of course, you can widen here as well: with an estimated 12 meters plus the 2 extensions, that would be another 14 square meters additionally. The same goes upstairs; size then relaxes the upper floor :D
However, you end up with space everywhere because you compensate for the tight areas with enlargement. That also has to be paid for.
My fundamental opinion is: if you squeeze it in 2 to 3 spots, enlargement and thus increased costs are not the solution.

An architect is capable of designing equivalent floor plans. Ok, let the house be half a meter bigger if the costs are still acceptable, but then other possibilities for room planning arise anyway so that the utility room doesn't have to get lost in the middle of the house.
 

Barossi

2015-07-24 20:09:12
  • #6


Hello Yvonne,

thank you so, so much for your very valuable considerations. Nothing is that simple

.......although we really like the location of the rooms in relation to the cardinal directions. Also, the utility room in the middle does not trouble us.

Best regards, Barossi
 

Similar topics
06.05.2015Living/Dining/Kitchen: How do you live or how will you live?52
10.04.2015Cost estimate architect single-family house. Your assessment44
27.08.20152 full floors, passage to garage, utility room under stairs25
10.11.2017House plan by architect 2 floors with basement18
24.12.2017Kitchen: closed or open? What room layout?86
09.12.2017Renovation with architect: Suggestions for house floor plan desired21
20.12.2017Major mistakes in the floor plan? Kitchen too small?39
30.08.2020Bungalow floor plan 150 sqm, closed kitchen, covered terrace40
10.10.2019Single-family house by architect 150m² improvement suggestions and ideas wanted75
25.11.2019New single-family house approx. 174 m² floor plan architect55
04.02.2020Waste disposal in the kitchen / Wall breakthrough42
03.09.2020Modern single-family house with architect in southern Germany25
29.09.2020Access from the garage to the utility room49
15.09.2021Ikea Pax utility room/laundry room system? - What do you have?64
24.10.2020Architect has not delivered - who will bear the costs?68
07.02.2021Single-family house, two floor plan variants from the architect39
28.10.2021Pantry vs. Larger Kitchen vs. Utility Room13
18.10.2024Plan a closed kitchen with an passage to the utility room18
20.11.2024Floor plan EFH165 sqm first draft - Architect dissatisfied74

Oben