ypg
2019-06-30 10:33:57
- #1
I agree. Compressing a floor plan has rarely worked.
So there are already quite a few changes. However, that also means a different floor plan. For example, where are the centimeters for the bedroom taken from? Surely from the bathroom. Why not from the living room?
Kitchen: how will the kitchen be furnished without a pantry?
I would say this: if you stick to symmetry, which no one benefits from, you patch here and there, but not the oversized living room.
I don’t see the distance between kids/parents as so critical.
Windows have to go into the house, for light.
Utility room without a passage door, otherwise the storage space is not enough and no one uses it because the utility room is full.
Dressing room/utility room will probably work better if rotated 90 degrees.
I only just see that the plan already has changes. Now the kitchen is quite large.
I don’t see it as sensible to simply omit a room that doesn’t work and, without thinking about the square meters, add them to another room. The kitchen didn’t need those square meters.
And since the route from kitchen to storage room is very long, I suggest:
Toilet in the storage room, create storage in the kitchen (a bit more planning than with the pantry), mediate office and child’s room, shorten the corridor.
P.S. If you design the kitchen as a rectangle, the dining area has more potential, you have possibilities to shift everything somewhat towards the terrace, so that the dressing room would also benefit.
Yes, in the master bedroom a few more centimeters will be added
The pantry will be omitted.
The short wall in the children's room will still be removed.
We are still in conflict about the utility room, one says it is enough as it is, the other says it is not enough.
So there are already quite a few changes. However, that also means a different floor plan. For example, where are the centimeters for the bedroom taken from? Surely from the bathroom. Why not from the living room?
Kitchen: how will the kitchen be furnished without a pantry?
I would say this: if you stick to symmetry, which no one benefits from, you patch here and there, but not the oversized living room.
I don’t see the distance between kids/parents as so critical.
Windows have to go into the house, for light.
Utility room without a passage door, otherwise the storage space is not enough and no one uses it because the utility room is full.
Dressing room/utility room will probably work better if rotated 90 degrees.
I only just see that the plan already has changes. Now the kitchen is quite large.
I don’t see it as sensible to simply omit a room that doesn’t work and, without thinking about the square meters, add them to another room. The kitchen didn’t need those square meters.
And since the route from kitchen to storage room is very long, I suggest:
Toilet in the storage room, create storage in the kitchen (a bit more planning than with the pantry), mediate office and child’s room, shorten the corridor.
P.S. If you design the kitchen as a rectangle, the dining area has more potential, you have possibilities to shift everything somewhat towards the terrace, so that the dressing room would also benefit.