Why unfortunately? Too standard? Too problematic?
A design is always the result of all requirements (client wishes, legal aspects, plot requirements, budget, etc.) and their implementation. The present floor plan has been seen many times before. That doesn't necessarily mean it's bad, but it has weaknesses that cannot be explained by the fact that the floor plan has to fit every situation, and that is not good.
Yes, kind of like that is what we plan to do anyway.
Also regarding kitchen and planning:
Then plan it that way from the start!
Your pantry has a raw structural measurement of 1.01 m, minus plaster and space for the sliding door, leaving just over 90 cm. How deep is the shelf? In a pantry rather 40 cm than 30, leaving a maximum of just over 60 cm, cozy...
But you can also plan the entrance area together with the kitchen. Then you have a niche in the hallway for a wardrobe, depth 0.65, then the wall 0.24, then a kitchen unit 0.6, then a walkway 1.1, then a cooking island 0.9, again a walkway 0.9, outer wall. That adds up, otherwise plan differently. Structural engineering should also be feasible, etc. At the same time, plan sight lines, e.g., where should the main chopping area be so that at a window at point X you have the view towards Z.
None of that can a catalog floor plan provide; but you must know beforehand, e.g., what kind of kitchen you want, etc.
An open dressing room with possible disorder would bother me more than enclosed in its own room. Would there be possibilities to change the doors?
But that is not the choice decision.
You can design dressing rooms so that the bedroom is only used for sleeping, and the person dressing does not disturb the sleeper.
WD