WilderSueden
2023-10-28 12:50:06
- #1
I don't see any contradiction there. A new building is more expensive than an old building. But then you're just comparing apples and oranges. With an old building, there is the risk that you sugarcoat the need for renovation and postpone the necessary expenses into the future. If you try to make both houses roughly equivalent, there is almost nothing left of the old building and the costs can also get out of hand. With 100k and decent building substance, you can of course consider the existing house as a standing shell.That sounds to me like a contradiction to your words earlier in the same post ...