Neighbor objects after approved building application

Nevertheless, this is probably what it’s really about – and I see the objection against your building project as a bargaining chip (in the sense: you have no problem with his wish, then he withdraws his objection).

We have NOTHING against his garage, let him build it. He probably just wants to cause trouble, nothing else. The building authority says, you can build your garage, we say that... – he just doesn’t want to. He WANTS us to move 5m to the right, away from his property, but there are trees there.
Picture will come tomorrow.

Draw a picture on paper or something.

I will make you a picture tomorrow and try to upload it here. Now all the children are in bed and I can’t access the documents anymore.

THANK YOU very much!

If you want to exchange ideas, regarding disabled-accessible building or something similar Anitra is also building with a severely disabled child

Thanks. I’ll look for that in the next few days.

Have you also requested his building file?

No, should we maybe do that?

And sorry that it’s so terribly confusing and I’m writing so incoherently.
Best regards
Nicole

"On"? So, is your property overbuilt? Or has he basically built on the boundary (with 0mm)?

Well, we actually don't know that at the moment. According to the notary, he built UP TO the boundary, but with the fuss he's making right now, we sometimes entertain the thought that he has overbuilt. How could we find that out? But honestly, we don't really care. Our house has been fitted in, planned, and approved – it's okay for us as it is. Even with his garage, which he HAS to build NOW. Unfortunately, he just doesn't care about that at all.

Well, we actually don't know that at the moment. According to the notary, he built TO the boundary, but with the drama he's currently creating, we sometimes dare to think that he has built beyond it. How could we find that out?

When you start, it is usually sensible to have a rough survey done so that the earthworks contractor does not accidentally end up on the neighbor's land. In the case of infill development, the surveyor should also look for the boundary points. If he doesn’t need all the corner points, you give the guys on site a coffee and/or 50€ in hand, then they will first tell you that without paper. Then you can consider how to proceed further.

We have NOTHING against his garage,

That may be true, but does he know that? - You think logically and assume that he probably can't have this problem. He is thinking irrationally and from his perspective, he perhaps does have it after all.

No, should we possibly do that?

Just his boundary construction - which, as said, should have been recorded as a transfer of setback areas in your land register sheet in my opinion - gives reason to investigate the correctness on his side (or at the common boundary) in my view.

And sorry that it is so terribly confusing and that I write so incoherently.

That is called a causal connection.

So, I still don't understand, we need pictures so that we can help...

What and how did the neighbor build on your border? Where, on which border is he located, in the east?

Do the embankments affect him?

There are really people here who know what they're talking about, but you would have to post a site plan or something like that...

now don't get hung up on the "an" and "auf," what even? Sometimes it's building boundary (building envelope?) sometimes it's property boundary. There is no "auf" here, the property boundary is an imagined pencil-thick line, no one goes there with a thick brush and paints a penalty area boundary. Even there, the line belongs to the penalty area

One could still discuss what kind of accuracy cadastral law specifies for boundary points, in MV it is 6 cm to the right and left, so an uncertainty of 12 cm... now tell me where "auf" and "an" are supposed to be...

Otherwise, I can only repeat myself, give your lawyer the mandate and stay out of it. The lawyer should request access to the files and the lawyer should handle the correspondence.