Neighbor objects after approved building application

2018-08-08 22:11:08

It's not about revealing everything, but correcting what has already been disclosed. What's the point of posting an outdated site plan that doesn't show the supposed deviations, except for the roof pitch, where I wonder why a reduction of the roof pitch by 6° should be beneficial to accessibility.

Yes, if the neighbor has agreed to a building encumbrance.

Which needs to be checked. According to the site plan, he has built up to 2.8m of fill and wants to put a garage on it. That likely exceeds the scope of the privilege conditions.

The heights are on the site plan. Whether the TE actually wants to fill up 3.6m (!) on the north side remains unclear because of the outdated plan, as does the planned terrain modeling at the boundary.

You said it yourself. The neighbor can no longer assert an objection after more than three months.

Presumably, the TE has applied for amendments to the building permit. The neighbor was involved (too high retaining wall) and raised objections. Hence the limited calming effect of the posts referencing the parties involved in challenging the building permit, namely the neighbor and the building authority. By the way, the TE's architect let the neighbor know that he cannot build his garage if he does not agree to the 3.6m high retaining wall. And that's how the neighborhood dispute began.

Even if not everything is made up, it is full of inconsistencies, ranging from the engaged (#1) or to be engaged lawyer (#60), the illegible, outdated site plan to the barrier-free bungalow on a sloping property with more than 6m height difference.

Yeah, and that's why everything is made up .... as if people have no other hobbies ....

2018-08-08 22:17:27

It's not about everything being made up. But it might be sensible to address the objections and compile all the information given so far, including [aktueller Lageplan] etc., in a meaningful way, possibly even in a new thread (with reference to this thread) ... because then all the information could be in the first post of a thread. It can be found again more quickly.

2018-08-08 22:22:59

So wird ein weiteres Mal meine Paranoia von erfundenen Threads geschürt.

But what matters to me is that too often some are accused here ... that they are forum trolls etc just because they are not experts.

The OP has decided not to contribute anymore, so for now the topic is closed.

2018-08-08 23:01:25

allzuoft

In your thread back then, I expressed this suspicion after the number of posts reached triple digits and suddenly people who hadn't even read the previous posts revived long-discussed options and you allowed yourself to be carried away by it. But this has nothing to do with the fact that an OP is not an expert, but rather that despite all explanations and advice, they refuse to change their perspective and face the facts. And the same thing is happening here. Evil neighbor, poor OP. So what is the purpose of this thread, which began with this question:

Can we still start construction in September?

Neighbor objects after approved building application

Snowy36

kbt09

Snowy36

Escroda