Allthewayup
2022-12-20 17:00:05
- #1
Hi,
that deployment was really worth it. One question: What amounts of water have accumulated in the end? The initial calculation was 20 l/s, which equals 5 swimming pools per day! Does that much water really come through?
Best regards,
Andreas
We pumped around 7,300m³ of water in 14 days.
But this is partly due to a lower groundwater level than assumed in the calculation and partly because we set the house 10cm higher than planned and in practice we didn’t free the water down to 50cm below the footing but only about 30cm. Additionally, various soil factors, no rain during the 14 days, and more come into play. There are also practical examples where twice as much was pumped as calculated; you just can’t predict that in advance. We registered an extraction volume of 29,500m³.
If only the foundations, for example, are underwater, you can simply concrete them. The concrete displaces the water. Usually, normal submersible pumps can’t manage to pump that out anyway.
Under certain conditions probably feasible, however, this is only economical in exceptional cases since special concrete that is free from segregation is used for that. Pouring normal concrete under water means the fine particles and/or cement paste are washed out and thus the concrete is diluted. This endangers the stability and properties of the concrete. The water-cement ratio for such concrete must also be particularly high. Any structurally sound engineer tries to avoid this. You can certainly ignore a small puddle, but I would not recommend concreting "into the water" to anyone.