KfW funding for KfW 40 Plus houses from now and from 01.07.2021

  • Erstellt am 2021-02-04 18:00:06

Hangman

2021-11-04 13:40:09
  • #1
Please no hundredth discussion about the great double funding for two residential units. In principle, it is quite simple: if you really (!) want to build two residential units, then these two units must also be separate from each other. That means separate heating, utilities, ventilation, requirements for fire protection, escape routes, etc. This is not only stipulated by KfW, but also by state building codes, tenancy law, etc.

If the second residential unit is only pseudo-executed to snag the funding, you could theoretically limit yourself to the KfW requirements – but then you might have the above-mentioned problems later when renting out (if this is intended). But even then, you have the problem that the expenses for such a second residential unit are usually higher than the second funding.

Conclusion: if two residential units, then really proper and actually rent out. If you only want to build a EFH, get rid of the pseudo granny flat.
 

Diany4605

2021-11-04 14:35:40
  • #2
I understand which way the wind blows ;).

Your first paragraph of course makes sense, but could you maybe still give me a tip on this:

I can't find any indications of the requirements anywhere, neither at KfW nor BEG, and every house provider tells you something different (presumably due to half-knowledge).

You would help me a lot with that...
 

Hangman

2021-11-04 16:37:24
  • #3
My tip is in the last sentence, or more precisely the last half-sentence ;)
 

Diany4605

2021-11-18 12:06:00
  • #4


I would like to jump back in here and quote my own post. This time with the keyword "suspensive condition."

Let’s leave the second residential unit aside for now.

When signing with the builder, we have now signed such a suspensive condition. Can someone here tell me if that is really sufficient? The strange thing is that the wording of the suspensive condition is a 1:1 copy from the internet (found via Google in 15 seconds). Unfortunately, it states that this wording is for the loan variant of the subsidy. Does anyone know if there is a different condition for the grant variant?

I am also grateful for answers here...

(We really can’t be the only ones who somehow don’t get this and want this grant variant of the new subsidy!?)
 

Similar topics
13.02.2015KfW Energy Efficient Building11
03.08.2015Semi-detached house with 2 residential units KFW10
10.05.2016KfW funding for two-family house26
01.05.2021KfW loan + repayment grant for granny flat39
10.12.2017Second residential unit in the house due to KfW funding 15313
28.03.2021KfW funding for 2-3 residential units possible despite self-use?10
21.03.2021Land registry later than planned - save KfW funding18
18.04.2021How does one correctly balance between the Building Energy Act and KfW 55, 40, and 40 Plus?45
08.05.2021New building with granny flat - general contractor restricts rental and KfW funding51
06.07.2021KfW loan is expected to become cheaper from 01.07.58
05.07.2021Additional costs for residential units99
31.08.2021Kfw 40 Plus funding - Ban on feed-in tariff?21
12.11.2021Exclusion of funding / Purchase contract signed before KFW grant10
14.06.2022KfW BEG funding stopped 261, 262, 263, 264, 461, 463, 4641239
06.09.2022KFW 461 - Complete renovation to energy-efficient house - Residential units17
07.01.2024KfW Funding Climate-Friendly Residential Building from March 2023152
19.07.2023Double KFW 297 funding through two residential units?16
26.02.2024Energy renovation and extension, KFW 261 example51
31.10.2024KFW 300 Funding - Attractiveness23
11.01.2025KfW 300 funding upon disposal of real estate ownership10

Oben