Hello @Yaso2.0 do you possibly have plans of the situation? Or have you already brought up the problem here?
In my thread the situation is described right in the first post. If we wanted to place the L-shaped stones directly at the boundary, we would have to carry out the work over a private road, which I would very much like to avoid. None of the 4 road builders could offer me the stones with the "reversed" angle, as reported by , or one said directly, "that will be really expensive".. Therefore, I have to look for an alternative that can be built from my property and takes up the least space from the property, since on one side I only have 3.50 m distance.
There is nothing better than L-shaped stones in this respect. Although they are a bit expensive with the visible inside, it should also last a few years...
How much did the running meter cost you? Delivery / installation / how big?
I’m also very interested!
That definitely works and is not "botched". If it doesn’t work with L-shaped stones in terms of handling, then it should work just as well with shuttering stones! Even with 17.5 cm stones and cheaper anyway! You just need a bit more rebar / running meter at 1.5 m and that’s it.
That’s what our landscaping contractor also said.
Personally, I would (especially) at 1.5 m height neither want to look at shuttering stones, nor L-shaped stones and not even that much at natural stones. Therefore my current plan at 1.0 m wall is to at least partially clad it with wood. For the appearance doesn’t matter, if I understood that correctly…?
No, appearance does of course play a role! We would initially plaster the wall, then clad it. Probably alternating with wood and facing bricks and a small floor fountain (waterfall). There are lots of inspirations on the net for this. So you can definitely make such a wall look nice later :)
Nowhere did I read that appearance wouldn’t matter...
Right, it naturally does matter too..