Katastrophy
2018-10-01 14:03:59
- #1
Some can only afford the house because they have to enter into short interest rate terms, otherwise it’s not affordable. To me, that’s speculation, especially when expenditure increases are foreseeable.
But you are reading along, right? We don’t have to enter into a short interest rate term. We would "easily" manage 20 years, even 25 if everything goes smoothly. Expenditure increases are not foreseeable but theoretically possible, whereby we could counteract well up to a certain point through savings in other areas. And honestly? For whom are expenditure increases, in the definition you use, not "foreseeable"? Honestly, slowly I really feel like I have to have children tomorrow just because I have ovaries. I really wonder how I managed to stay child-free for the last 10 years. It almost seems impossible. Does everyone automatically have to have children within the next 2 years if they think about building a house? Sure, often that goes hand in hand. But there can well be exceptions. Is it so absurd to want to address the topic of children only when one has achieved something professionally in life and realizes enough salary in the household so that the thought of children "pays off"? ("Pays off" in the sense of: Can you then offer the children something when they are there, or is it not even worth thinking about because you can’t anyway)
My wife and I have a large salary gap. If I stop working, there is no more house. It’s that simple.
And for that, she also has to politely and nicely say "thank you, thank you" every day, right?