Hausi1909
2021-01-13 13:31:02
- #1
I would remove the "something." And one should choose an architect instead of a draftsman not least because a) she will talk you out of such a huge smoker's balcony for the child and b) manages on both sides not to have to exempt the eaves heights by "50 to 80 cm" (or rather: want to, because I rely on the reason of the official mold). The house is way too big. If you are not double earners in A14, it is beyond your means - but at least it offers endless space where none is needed. Train your sense of proportion. And yes, the suspicion is correct: per square meter, a roof terrace easily ends up costing at least as much as fully enclosed space.
Yes, we definitely want at least a knee wall of 1.20m on the upper floor, but at the same time we don’t want to dig in with our terrace next to the footpath so that everyone looks down on us. That probably won’t really work without an exemption. The roof terrace can of course also be much smaller, but then won’t there be problems with the one permitted full storey? I understood it that the roof terrace is needed in that size for the storey count.
We also think that the house is currently overdimensioned and have no problem if it becomes smaller. We definitely still need to train our sense of proportion, thanks for the tip!
Is it then cost-neutral whether the extension has a flat roof that is not accessible or is used as a roof terrace?
Thanks for your comments!