ypg
2021-07-05 14:56:37
- #1
Me again, I looked at some things again and read them carefully. What I noticed is:
Yes, I think so. It is a stylish house, no question. But inside, the upstairs is really left aside. You have to go through a "hallway" to get to the children's room. I think, as a small child, I would be afraid to have to open the "apartment door" and then go through the place where the garages also are to get to the sleeping floor. And what if I sleep restlessly as a child? Then you have a very long and far way to check if everything is alright. I don't find that family-friendly. Small children do have to be checked fairly often. Passing through the chill lounge through a bottleneck at the kitchen is also not everyone’s thing. Basically, the house doesn’t really meet a need. It’s not a family house, for a yuppie house the kitchen is not well placed, the apartment might be suitable for an au pair, but it’s not senior-friendly for today's times.
The upstairs staircase could benefit from a window in the east. I had thought of roof windows for the lower hallway, but that's where the upstairs already starts.How can the entrance area be optimized regarding daylight?
It makes a difference whether two people in love/young couple share an apartment or a senior couple. The reasons are obvious: tolerance and ailments, hearing impairment, or described it very well recently :)Apartment for tenants:[*] Size: approx. 50 sqm; orientation was our old 2-room apartment here
But they could, if they wanted, change rooms, avoid each other.The parents (both in their early 60s) currently still live in their own house. Since the children moved out, much is empty
"Age-appropriate" fits better. And it does for this purpose, we think. Don’t you?
For a former farmer probably less... Man, he may do the garden, but he's rather locked up there, isn’t he?!One has to say that my father is a self-employed farmer himself
Of course, further feedback on the rest of the plan, not concerning the tenant apartment, is also welcome.
We just wanted to have certain eventualities considered. This includes, for example, positioning the stairs so that we could divide the house into two residential units with ground floor and upper floor if we wanted to.
Maybe we're getting carried away with the thought of planning for every eventuality?
Yes, I think so. It is a stylish house, no question. But inside, the upstairs is really left aside. You have to go through a "hallway" to get to the children's room. I think, as a small child, I would be afraid to have to open the "apartment door" and then go through the place where the garages also are to get to the sleeping floor. And what if I sleep restlessly as a child? Then you have a very long and far way to check if everything is alright. I don't find that family-friendly. Small children do have to be checked fairly often. Passing through the chill lounge through a bottleneck at the kitchen is also not everyone’s thing. Basically, the house doesn’t really meet a need. It’s not a family house, for a yuppie house the kitchen is not well placed, the apartment might be suitable for an au pair, but it’s not senior-friendly for today's times.