Yay,
we have spent a lot of time in the past months on samples, offers, financing, etc.
And in this context, we recently finally got an appointment regarding Bayernlabo at the district office, for which the plan naturally also plays a crucial role.
The conclusion was that at least the interest subsidy program would be an option for us. The square meters just barely work out, although they "actually only fund children’s rooms up to 15 sqm" (meaning there is apparently some discretion).
That’s why the topic of a third children’s room also came up, which could be taken into account if one at least "in principle would consider having more children."
Against this background, we brought up the point in last week’s conversation with the construction company and wanted to have such an alternative planned in the upper floor to see if it even makes sense.
At first glance, I really liked the idea, but after a closer look, we are no longer so sure whether we would regret this solution.
Therefore, here again are the current floor plans with questions/explanations. We would be happy about optimization ideas from your side, as we would like to submit the application in the next few weeks to be able to start in spring.
Basement:
I am quite happy with it so far, maybe we will still plan a small window next to the outside door in "Basement I," even if it is shaded by the terrace.
Do you think 14.99 sqm is enough for the utility room (gas + buffer + ventilation)? Washing machine/dryer don’t have to go in there, no idea why the draftsman was so creative there.
Ground floor:
We are quite satisfied with the "L" for kitchen/living with the corner window. We discarded the idea of a separate office — in a pinch, one can also install a small desk niche like the example shown.
The kitchen proportions still need to be adjusted — the long side should of course not go right up to the terrace door, as the piece on the drawing appears too long.
I still wanted to have this corrected, even if it doesn’t matter for the approval.
Upper floor:
Here I would have attached the current and last draft for comparison.
I think both have their appeal — now
putting aside any subsidies or a possible desire for children:
In the old draft (OG4a), I like the clear structure and the, in my opinion, very successful (fair) division.
The new one (OG5) creates more flexibility at first glance, whether for another child, for a guest room, as an office, or to later bring a washing machine/dryer upstairs if needed.
However, the latter is no use to me if the other two children’s rooms no longer really work. The knee wall of about 2 m, for example, does not allow you to place cabinets arbitrarily. Regarding the beds, the small light strips in the south could possibly be shifted a bit…
What do you, as outsiders, think about the two variants?
