Arauki11
2024-12-30 11:37:15
- #1
That's exactly what I don't understand, that you actually give this planning-wise simpler and apparently tax-favorable construct the label "idea" and maybe even fixate on it. In my opinion, for a person you appreciate and from whom you also always benefit, you don't plan a 6sqm bedroom, and that still in the leftover basement; not even for a person you don't like. This very sleeping cave alone indicates the considerable undervaluation of this housemate, since the own bedrooms, bathrooms, etc. are quite generously designed. As repeatedly said also from other sides, a basement remains a basement, no matter how much you try to sugarcoat it. If that's really not possible from a planning perspective at all, which I can't imagine, then you chose the wrong plot for such a lifestyle, which, older person or not, is in a way a shared one. For me personally, a house only becomes beautiful and special when it is not just the mere, stylish building, but a beautiful and protected place for everyone. With older, tendentially weaker people, I think the younger housemates even have a higher obligation to ensure this. Actually, the priorities here seem to be rather on tax advantages; a tax or funding topic would come for me only at the end of the considerations, namely when the interpersonal concerns can really work for everyone. I do not want to attack you with this, but I wanted to clarify a different perspective for you BEFORE this decision; of course, you can decide independently and then it’s none of my business. If the principle is not right, there is no need to discuss details, I suppose I am not the suitable discussion partner here, which is why I better exit your thread. I still think a good solution can be found, which I wish for all of you.Maybe from the beginning we are fixating on the idea that the granny flat should be in the basement.