11ant
2025-01-01 19:25:41
- #1
The entire OSW flank. Everything from leaves in the east, two chestnut trees in the south, and spruces all the way to the west. All historically grown. That’s why we are keen not to make the house too wide.
Then please draw them in.
So far we have only stated requirements and arranged them like a backlog with clear priorities for orientation, in case decisions have to be made. That is (if at all) a specification sheet. What exactly do you mean by a requirements specification?
And regarding the relaunch: we are the laymen. What solution comes out in the end is not dictated by us but by the architect. Otherwise, it is always said that you should describe your wishes and ideas as well as possible. How was that again with bathing and getting wet?
Your self-perception and external perception of the strictness of the architect’s management still seem to need alignment.
No offense, but letting one parent move in with the other parents in a shared flat, despite all the comedy, does not seem like a stroke of genius but rather a case of botched planning. The rest is written so imaginatively that I could only explain it by having had too much leftover mulled wine in my system. A guest room so that people can escape from the shared flat as a suite. I like your humor, but I’m not sure whether you are blowing way beyond the mark here in your future planning.
I am also far from meaning unconventional suggestions even remotely comedically, and I last drank mulled wine during my Juso days twenty years ago (but otherwise have remained loyal to Hönninger fruit juices).
By the way, this botched planning comes from an architect with 20 years of experience and, from our point of view, reliable good references. We certainly did ourselves no favor by iterating it again and raising objections beforehand. I do not want to absolve myself here. With all your feedback—and presumably one of you is an architect—I would have expected pushback from the architect as well, and indeed before draft 1. To return to comedy: architects—isn’t that rather your guild and we are the ones who finance it?
See above: the architect apparently did not feel invited to give pushback before preparing the first draft—probably in connection with the communication of the specification framework. Regarding my universal education (not as an architect), you never received Bafög from me. Architects are not “my guild,” I am, as a freelance building consultant, if anything, “biased in favor of the client.” If I myself belonged to the architects’ guild, I would allow myself considerably less criticism of the “colleagues” then.