Floor plan detached house, 2 full floors and a recessed floor

Attached is an overall overview, we are planning with plot no. 11.

Access from the north is possible on both sides of the house. The blue lines are intended to represent surface water running on the surface. The location of the supply lines is not yet known to me, but they should be directly in front of the house (3m front yard). Regards Stephan

Such a spacious house, and then you constantly have to maneuver the cars because they can only fit one behind the other. :rolleyes:

Two notes:

[*]As long as the development plan is up to date, the staggered floor does not have to be recessed. It only has to have < 75% of the floor area of the floor below.
[*]The budget will not be enough. Either build smaller and/or leave out the basement - or just increase the budget (the budget, not the house).

Just checked. The development plan is from last year, so point 1 of my statement above applies.

Hello Stephan, Regarding your 3 most important questions that are anchored in the EG: no, no, no. Parking spaces one behind the other usually do not count. A carport as a boundary building, rotate the utility room, part of it behind the carport also as a boundary building, use the exposed corner of/from the house as a parking space. That works. Does it remain a utility cellar? Play cellar? Where is the architect in the game? Edit: I confused the office with the utility room :rolleyes:

Hello ypg, unfortunately I couldn’t make sense of the first part of your answer. What do you mean by 3 x “no”? I understand the problem with the parking spaces, unfortunately a double garage is not feasible in terms of area. I like your suggestion regarding the office (“utility room”) towards the back. Question about that: the carport is already on the boundary, which is fine as a subordinate building, but how about an office? I am not allowed to place that on the boundary since it’s living space, right? The cellar is intended to be designed as a utility cellar. The architect was initially involved but then maneuvered himself out of the picture... We are currently looking for a capable general contractor/masonry construction provider for a new attempt...

I have measured a building plot of 11.9 m according to the plan * 13.5 m. Where did you get the values from?

Why not plot #12? Easier to build on, certainly also cheaper.

What is located in the south?

Just checked. The development plan is from last year, so point 1 of my statement above applies.

Good morning K1300S,
I share your assessment regarding maneuvering. Unfortunately, I currently see no other option except to have a carport on both sides of the house, which then looks a bit like Mickey Mouse ears... A double garage would steal too much living space on the ground floor...
As far as I understand development plan No. 900 of the city of Bochum, the following is noted in the textual version:
"2.2.4 Top floors
...
In general residential areas WA 1, for buildings with flat roofs, an additional floor above the top full floor is permitted if it is set back by at least 1.00 m on all sides behind the vertically rising outer wall of the full floor below."
I understand this to mean that this development plan is stricter than the state building code, which only targets 75% of the floor area below. How do you evaluate this?
Regards
Stephan