11ant
2021-03-16 13:45:38
- #1
As far as I understand development plan No. 900 of the city of Bochum, the following is noted in the textual version:
"2.2.4 Top floors
...
In general residential areas WA 1, for buildings with flat roofs, an additional floor above the top full floor is permitted, if it on all sides recedes by at least 1.00 m behind the vertically rising outer wall of the full floor below.
That reads harmlessly, but it is quite explosive: read knowledgeably it unfortunately means nothing other than that on four out of four sides there are A. exterior walls (i.e. load-bearing walls) that do not stand on top of their counterparts in the floor below and B. in the area of the setback there is a floor slab making a roof, which requires massively increased insulation effort – among other things with “Isokörben” (R). This will be extremely expensive structurally and energetically, and thus the additional living space of the recessed floor becomes a Pyrrhic victory in terms of price per square meter. If the area of the recessed floor is not dispensable, this would be a decisive argument against this property for me. I see right now I should probably once calculate something like my basement formula also for recessed floors.
Do you have a fixed idea regarding "another staircase" that you can pull out of the sleeve, which is easier to integrate?
The staircase is another problem: because of the retreat on all sides it is also pulled away from the outer wall in the floors below, which can cause quite a hassle, as can be admired in:
The transfer of ownership only happens when the design has been "approved" by the project development company according to the "design guidelines" for this building area. Then a building application can be submitted and therefore the land purchase can be notarized.
We already had such clowning here as well, in the thread by (if I remember correctly, in the Pforzheim area): there one had to apply with preliminary designs of one’s house in order to be allowed to buy the plot. That means a committee like an architectural competition jury reviewed the plans to check if they were nice enough to be considered worthy of construction in the ensemble with those of the neighbors. Only after the "approval" (“Gutbefund”) of this committee (I had never heard such a Swiss-sounding term before in Germany) was the humble petitioner allowed to submissively acquire the highly imperial consecrated building ground. Good gracious, I had hoped such nonsense was at least a unique case – is there seriously such a thing now even in the Ruhr area, which is usually considered the last refuge of the "normal people"?
for a family with four children. You certainly don’t find that on catalog page 17...
No, page 17a, you have to unfold that ;-)
I would not throw in the towel because of “the two additional children” when it comes to finding something among standard designs: in my guess such designs for two-child families plus a granny flat often can be adapted quite well with minimal intervention. Unless they are quadruplets, with four children there are usually some who will be ready to leave home quite soon or are not ungrateful for not having to be too close together with the younger siblings.
I can understand the idea of downsizing. It will probably inevitably come down to that in the end when the offers from the general contractor/general contractor (GU/GÜ) are available...
Houses are like breasts: downsizing is the significantly more difficult operation. The same applies to the procedure of adapting plans after offers: that is the very bad wrong order. The tendering always follows the planning, N.E.V.E.R. the other way around!
You could inquire at a company from Marl, whose name begins like the vehicle registration plate in Sprockhövel. They don’t have a catalog, and are basically rather in the mid/upscale (not luxury) segment.
Always these riddles – EN or WIT?
The (junior) boss also has children, by the way, but he is a BVB fan.
That doesn’t bother me as a damn Prussian at all if someone beats Bayern at their own game ;-)