11ant
2017-10-02 19:04:43
- #1
To be honest, the entire building. While the floor plans still look clear (albeit poorly planned), the building's volume appears like a wildly interlocked ensemble of shoeboxes. Overall, the building seems unable to decide whether it should cross the slope lengthwise or widthwise. The windows surely also suffer from the "modular" combination, i.e., the three-winged ones look like one and a half double-winged windows. Relative floor-to-ceiling height, i.e., floor-to-ceiling only relating to one (which, however, does not lead to a terrace) storey, would rather make this worse. In the interplay of formats, arrangement, and composition, the facades SO and NO look like they have been equipped with windows by a vending machine in a rhythm. Does the house want to be a house or a sculpture, or can it not even decide between the two? – this is unclear here. And because the way this is unclear reminds me of another specific design here, hence the link to the other post.What do you find particularly unsuccessful? The double-wing windows?