ypg
2021-06-22 23:45:16
- #1
Functionality beats aesthetics here...
The little room under the stairs is not a pantry and can barely hold as much as a 60 cm tall kitchen cabinet!
I would like to implement that, but wouldn’t the traffic route between the living room <-> dining/kitchen become too narrow then?
I don’t see any necessity to accommodate a traffic route in a back room.
I see a huge open space there, which rather makes the living room feel uncomfortable, as it is not really part of the seating area.
Shouldn’t there be at least 1.50 m passage width?
Counter question: Do your hallways have a width of 1.50 m?
the air space is supposed to - through height - neutralize the perceived narrowness in the entrance area relative to the feeling in the living room.
????
the air space is supposed to - through height - neutralize the perceived narrowness in the entrance area relative to the feeling in the living room. So to create an optical balance.
You will achieve exactly the opposite through height: the room looks visually narrower the higher the ceiling.
Sounds from the living room (TV, music, guests, etc.) cannot directly press toward the children’s room this way.
Then you have to completely forgo the air space, because the same effect has the air space in front.
Furthermore, the bedroom should have a garden view, which leads to the arrangement of the parent area from dressing room <-> bathroom <-> bedroom (from top of plan to planned bottom), which we consider very impractical and not very nice.
I didn’t say that you should relocate the bedroom from the corner of the house – the mental sequence from top to bottom of the plan would be bathroom, dressing room, bedroom.