Floor plan bungalow with granny flat - floor plan feedback

The priorities are different for everyone. The tips here are partly amazing. You don't like my draft at all from beginning to end. Wrong shape, wrong layout. Everything wrong, okay. I'm having trouble getting anything useful out of it. What I understand: The kitchen is too small The bedroom next to the living room has disadvantages, the rest, well I have to digest this first.

It's not about disliking the floor plan. It's about the fact that many things included are simply impractical or will cause regret later. Nothing more.

By the way, Blaupuma, you can do the same with your furniture: just take a pencil in your hand once in a while, so you can get a feeling for dimensions and spaces.

Is that a symmetry neurosis?

I am currently having quite a strong déjà vu here, with Schustrik’s project, see (symmetry fixation, granny flat, resistance to advice).

Priorities lie elsewhere for everyone.

But not necessarily in a way that directly leads to Waterloo!

I have difficulty extracting anything meaningful.

And I have the same difficulty regarding making an effort to give you concrete starting points for improvements. It really is so fundamentally flawed that patches won’t help; a complete rewrite is needed.

At first, I don’t see a “bungalow” here at all, but visually a one-and-a-half-story house. Then I see the desire for Scandinavian-style openness, which – however – particularly emphasizes tightness (as it occurs here in several room widths but also overall dimensions like those of the pantry “kitchen”). I am almost impressed by how much tightness you manage to create in such a spacious house.

The attitude “we don’t need a garage” is something you first have to afford. But who can afford that: not to care whether their house would fetch a good price at auction? – a building of this size without a garage is like a Mercedes S-Class with crank windows, something that will only be sold to traveling carpet traders.

Bullying? That’s cheeky! I’m out!

I regret that I even drew for 10 minutes today... having to listen to people say the shape might not be right, even though I copied it. And by the way: as OP, you should read through the posts and internalize them, try to understand, rather than burning your own thread, and with it the chance to improve the draft.

Bullying? That is cheeky!

Well, on the other hand, logically (or whatever it's called) quite understandable. The OP is working on a drawing that looks combed and washed and to him appears as if he is close to the goal. And then there is only trouble. But unfortunately, there are children who really only their own mother can find beautiful, and this house design is practically a prime example of that. I would have liked to take the trouble to address individual points (turning the staircase or similar). It's just that: if something only has six corners and fundamentally something needs to be changed at seven corners, then starting over is simply the best choice. This is said without any ill intent.

Well, on the other hand, züschel logic (or whatever it's called) is quite understandable. The OP assembles a drawing that looks combed and washed and to him it seems as if he is just about to reach the goal. And then there is only trouble.

This is probably less bullying here than – if you look at the drawing – self-explanatory.
OP asked, we invested our knowledge. End of story... I'm out before I get cheeky myself.