Escroda
2020-01-30 07:33:05
- #1
Or are there any loopholes in the case of infill development.
Loopholes are opened by §31 of the Building Code. But since the development plan prevents construction in two ways (no building plot and no access), there will be explanations in the justification for the development plan, so the principles of the planning are likely affected and thus the loophole remains closed.
Like the amendment of the development plan or something like that?
That would no longer be a loophole. The procedure is elaborate, must be well justified and requires extensive public participation.
The city can then easily (with us after coordination in the building committee, etc.) amend the development plan.
Easy it is only if the public is asleep or fully agrees with the planning.
"building is not allowed there"
... is the current legal situation.
"listen, the development plan doesn’t matter at all ..."
... is nonsense
"... in 4 years at the latest they will also be building in the gardens"
Four years for a legally binding development plan amendment would be very ambitious (well, one does not know if and how long considerations have been worked on in secret) and only conceivable without public resistance. But since the current development plan does not seem to be that old, IMHO nothing significant will change there for the next 20 years.