Hello Hans,
[*]Now there are setback areas to be observed, three meters on each side. We have agreed with our neighbor on the west side (who is also building) that he will relinquish 2 meters of setback area to us. This means that he keeps 5 meters distance to the property boundary, which allows us to build 2 meters closer to the boundary on this side and only have to keep 1.30 meters (instead of 3.30 meters) distance.
I am not familiar with the Bavarian bureaucratic procedures, but before you consider the reduction of the required setback area as a fact, I would ask at the responsible building planning office. In NRW, 5.00 m is rather rare, but it does happen and then it is often difficult to fall below this requirement; even with the neighbor’s consent.
[*]On the west side, a garage is to be integrated into the house,
Are you aware of the additional costs that will be incurred by the owner through this project – besides the loss of living space?
Question: Is it possible to divide the property so that it is not split in a straight line? Meaning the house is divided exactly in the middle, but then the dividing line shifts one meter to the east, thus splitting the gardens into two equally sized halves?
It is possible – but what is the use of that? You have to work with encumbrances and end up, among other things, with a dark corner on the ground floor that you can only use to a limited extent. In the attic or also upper floor – depending on how many stories you want to build – you will have to accept restrictions regarding dormers or gable projections; not to mention fire protection... that will hardly be different in Bavaria.
As long as two families live next to each other who know each other well, are related/friends, maybe that is not a problem. But what if the perfect world cracks – for whatever reason? Would you want to have a constant fence guest about 1.50 meters away from your living room window?
Furthermore: prefabricated garages with a width of 3.30 m are – relative to the standard (2.96 m wide, providers need 0.04 m “play” for setting down the garage) – considerably more expensive; I would rather recommend using a standard garage, perhaps 3.00 x 9.00 m, and allocate the saved 0.30 m to the neighbor’s property and then make a “normal” central property division. Either way, you won’t be entirely fair to the future neighbor – if it should come to that – because he will have to accept loss of living space and additional costs due to the integrated garage.
Whether a duplex garage can be placed directly on the property boundary without further ado, you should also clarify in discussions with the building planning office before planning. Either way, I find the access angle (according to your attached drawing) to your garage quite tricky. But maybe that is deceptive since you have not added the surrounding buildings to the drawing.
Rhenish regards