Thank you very much for your assessments. Let's start with the taste: Water certainly changes its taste depending on how strongly it is demineralized. There are opinions stating the more, the better. And others who believe that the taste worsens the stronger it is demineralized. I also do not like the taste of demineralized water. However, I have tried water with just over zero, 4° and more (about 8°) at friends' places, chilled and unchilled – and I feel like in a blind test with music: Yes, there seem to be differences (there were days in between), but every change in coffee or tea variety, even between individual batches, will certainly have a stronger effect – and what is "better" or "worse" I cannot judge. That is really irrelevant to me.
Bypass per hose: Per hose? Preferably one that is not food-safe?? And also the drinking water suitable PE pipes (with blue identifying thread) will not come into my house. Laying a composite pipe up to the main tap point (kitchen) does not seem sensible to me as long as I do not consistently refrain from sausage, cheese, pickled fish or any kind of meat. And that is out of the question. By the way, I have not found a neutral, scientifically (1) comprehensible (2) treatise on the subject. Only more or less extreme personal opinions, expressed with differing intensity.
MayrCh, many thanks for your detailed presentation. I have seen this presented this way for the first time (Sweetspot). Do you have a link for me to read more on this? I find it interesting that there is hardly any difference between soft water and medium water hardness (from 8°dH, Bremen, for example, has 5°). Because if that is the case, one would kill two birds with one stone and certainly stay below the limit value. Manufacturers advertise with saving modes based on the fact that one does not soften to 0°. Why don’t they advertise that 8-10° is perfectly sufficient?
I am increasingly inclined to install such a system without a bypass and operate it at 4°dh.
Best regards Stefan