11ant
2022-01-08 17:21:17
- #1
I was not specifically thinking of the robber - - His problem was actually first dimensionally that the general contractor indeed could build "everything" in the sense of Henry Ford (in any color, provided it is black), 08/15 gladly also with gold-framed light switches, but still 08/15; and in the second dimension, that his general contractor took the project as a guinea pig for trying out a new shell builder. Haute couture from the general contractor very likely goes spectacularly wrong, even if there should be chief physician villas with swimming pools as references.I am thinking of quite a few comrades here. The most well-known example, but I believe no longer searchable or linkable, is the user Hotzenplotz: also a Mio project, he wanted a lot of frills and many changes, everything thought through down to the smallest detail, but every corner somehow caused a problem with the general contractor (who is not suited for such things)
Exactly: the construction service description is a good indicator for the presumed overwhelm of the craftsmen. The more it deviates from one’s own wishes, the more crooked it will go (see also my stone mantra). But also, which building proposals the contractor has in his program: the more he acts as a building contractor instead of a general contractor, the less practice he has with houses for clients from the higher salary brackets. Then you quickly get 70 sqm living rooms, which indeed offer significantly more area to clean - but unfortunately without a gain in spaciousness.?3: the construction service description for the "turnkey" house. [...] And that because of a house room, which a general contractor does not have in his repertoire and simply overwhelms the craftsmen.