Cost-effective building without loss of quality, architect's house

What you imagine won't work with your budget. And even if it did. Are you aware of what your steep slope means for the outdoor facilities? Unless you’re a virtuoso with an excavator, you’ll be facing another 100,000 EUR to properly lay everything out.

How much budget do you think is needed for a house like this? We are already talking about almost 200,000 EUR in additional costs compared to a cheap, turnkey prefabricated house.

Here is a picture of the slope.


The house is supposed to go where the hut stands.
Next to the hut, a hole was dug for the survey, and at about 1.0-1.2m depth you hit rock.
The goal is that the front edge of the house does not extend much further than the hut itself does now. 1-2 meters is fine, but it’s rather unrealistic that the house will start exactly where the hut ends. It is theoretically possible, practically not; I won’t explain the closer reasons, please just accept that and don’t suggest putting the house somewhere else.

The slope behind (to the right in the picture) is quite steep, about 4-6 meters high, impossible to walk up, more like climbing on all fours.
Towards the front it slopes moderately, but the wall under the hut is probably 50-80 cm high (estimated, not measured).
The hut itself is, again estimated, 2.5-3 meters wide.

I removed the sky and the view from the picture because I want to keep a minimum of privacy on the internet. That has to be accepted until the site plan of the property is completed.

Cost-effective building without loss of quality, architect-designed house
Sorry but there are 2 contradictions in that

No, so that’s actually nonsense, no. "Cost-effective without loss of quality" is not a contradiction, but a challenge; and cost-effective with an architect is even a correlation (assuming an architect " approved").

Here is a picture of the slope.

It couldn’t be more annoying: first no illustration at all, then an example with the addition that it does not represent the situation to be illustrated, and now a picture from which the perspective information is maximally pixelated. If someone so clearly does not want advice, then I’m obviously out. Whoever bites helping hands has to manage without me.

Show us the property [Lageplan mit Strasse und Himmelsrichtung und Angaben zur Gefällerichtung.] Is there no geoportal? Is this building land? Residential unit House 2. The neighbors' place of residence doesn't sound like it. What you have shown here is the ground floor and basement. Does this work with rock at 1 m depth???

The Bayernatlas provides so much information. I am happy to wait for it.

since I want to maintain a minimum level of privacy on the internet

Unfortunately, it is the case that helpful answers require as much information as possible. Of course, you are free to share less, but then you will also receive less or no input. Don’t worry, no one will come to your door in three years to check whether you have installed the toilet exactly as planned.

I removed the sky and the view from the picture because I want to maintain a minimum level of privacy on the internet. You have to live with that until the site plan of the property is completed.

Is the property not yet in the Bayernatlas?