motte2
2014-11-12 11:44:03
- #1
Hello,
now I want to report how things turned out for us.
As written on 29.8., I have a single-family house from 53, with controlled residential ventilation and a room air-independent stove. The chimney sweep insisted on a pressure monitor or proof that no more than 8Pa negative pressure would occur in the house.
The proof was neither available from the manufacturer, nor from the planner or installer. They also suggest a pressure monitor.
The chimney sweep then reported the defect to the building authority.
In the end, we agreed with the chimney sweep on a pressure comparison measurement during regular operation.
The pressure difference was measured between outside air and the air in the stove installation room. That day it was quite windy and the pressure fluctuated by about 4Pa. No difference was detected whether the ventilation system was off, running at normal or full fan stage. With this, the chimney sweep’s conditions were met.
Additionally, I wanted a measurement with blocked supply air at full fan stage (worst case). Here the negative pressure in the room increased by about 2Pa, so a maximum of 5Pa was reached. Of course, one must say that although my house was extensively modernized, it does not reach the airtightness of a passive house.
Conclusion:
My RLU stove was approved without a pressure monitor.
The pressure test cost 250 euros.
For my safety, I hung up a CO alarm. It costs 50 euros, runs on battery, and must be completely replaced every 6 years. I claim it is safer and more reliable than a pressure monitor.
Regards
Michael
now I want to report how things turned out for us.
As written on 29.8., I have a single-family house from 53, with controlled residential ventilation and a room air-independent stove. The chimney sweep insisted on a pressure monitor or proof that no more than 8Pa negative pressure would occur in the house.
The proof was neither available from the manufacturer, nor from the planner or installer. They also suggest a pressure monitor.
The chimney sweep then reported the defect to the building authority.
In the end, we agreed with the chimney sweep on a pressure comparison measurement during regular operation.
The pressure difference was measured between outside air and the air in the stove installation room. That day it was quite windy and the pressure fluctuated by about 4Pa. No difference was detected whether the ventilation system was off, running at normal or full fan stage. With this, the chimney sweep’s conditions were met.
Additionally, I wanted a measurement with blocked supply air at full fan stage (worst case). Here the negative pressure in the room increased by about 2Pa, so a maximum of 5Pa was reached. Of course, one must say that although my house was extensively modernized, it does not reach the airtightness of a passive house.
Conclusion:
My RLU stove was approved without a pressure monitor.
The pressure test cost 250 euros.
For my safety, I hung up a CO alarm. It costs 50 euros, runs on battery, and must be completely replaced every 6 years. I claim it is safer and more reliable than a pressure monitor.
Regards
Michael