Consultation for photovoltaic systems

  • Erstellt am 2021-09-13 14:52:07

RotorMotor

2021-09-15 14:47:22
  • #1
Cool, numbers! Thanks! :-)
You can definitely address this concretely.


1 kWh storage is very unusual; the electronics (converter, balancer, etc.) are significantly more expensive in relation to the capacity.


Even if you charge and discharge the battery once a day, that would be 20 years.
I find that quite optimistic, but well, not impossible.

The next problem is that the lost feed-in tariff is missing here.
Therefore, only about 20 cents remain.


Already starting with a miscalculation:
2000 * 0.9 * 0.35 = €777 €630
Also, the lost feed-in tariff is again missing here, and why is electricity now 5 cents more expensive?
So halfway correctly:
2000 * 0.9 * 0.20 = €360


Including electronics, inverter, etc.?
That would be nice!
And still significantly more expensive than the €360 above.


I wonder why that is?


I can basically agree with that. Especially subsidies shift the calculation.

However, justifying the ecological meaningfulness is even much harder.
 

Deliverer

2021-09-15 15:28:00
  • #2
And of course, just like with the inverters, the purchase of a second storage device should be factored in within the 20-year balance sheet. Not because the cells break down. The electronics often say goodbye much earlier. And no, no one has to do the math. There are easily findable studies on the topic. All of them come to the same conclusion: storage is an expensive hobby. But hey - I don’t want to stop anyone from having a storage/hobby. AS LONG AS the storage is not used as a (financial) excuse for why the roof wasn’t fully outfitted. Because that is what the world really urgently needs: a lot more photovoltaics.
 

driver55

2021-09-15 17:26:38
  • #3
And exactly this calculation I would like to see. About the storage: what do you want with 1 kWh, please? If storage, then please so that I am largely self-sufficient even in winter – otherwise I haven’t achieved anything. And currently, that does not work without a “fat wallet.” And until these investments have “sun-paid” for themselves, how many leap years have passed?
 

hampshire

2021-09-15 17:30:27
  • #4

... and doesn't have to contribute anything himself...

once again a not wanting to understand will - per 1kW you can multiply.

Thanks for the correction.

Offsetting the feed-in tariff - right, you can include that in the electricity price - however you estimate it for the next 10 years. Currently around 7ct/kWh.

once again not wanting to understand, if you change the parameters, you can also change the electricity price forecast for the next 10 years. You can also calculate with falling prices or a strong increase. Guesswork remains guesswork.

That would have been your contribution for an answer. Shame, again no substance.

Strongly agree.
 

RotorMotor

2021-09-15 18:24:01
  • #5
In winter, you usually don’t fill your battery anyway (with the typical 7-10kWp systems). If you have a heat pump, it already consumes all the generated electricity. That’s why a small 1kWh battery is actually a great thing, because it covers the base load. So refrigerator, ventilation, etc. With that, you can really manage the cycles you need for it to pay off. Feel free to look at my profile; I have already posted many numbers, facts, and example calculations here. Belief and pure assertions are rather rare with me. ;-) Unfortunately not. Other variables change the calculation very much, completely different cycles, prices, etc. As written above, a 1kWh battery definitely has its appeal if it were available. I am more in favor of calculating with currently available figures. Electricity cost 28 cents and remuneration of 8 cents is real, as of today. Everything else is crystal ball. So here are a few possible reasons (even though you already find the real substance and correct numbers above): a) calculations are often done incorrectly/not done at all/belief is given to wrong calculations of sellers b) people believe in "self-sufficiency" and "their own electricity," even though most systems are not island-capable, sometimes only single-phase, etc. is often forgotten c) it is subsidized d) people believe, for whatever reason, in sharply rising electricity prices The list can gladly be extended.
 

hampshire

2021-09-15 18:42:17
  • #6
Yes, I would really like to have that too.
 

Similar topics
13.07.2016Photovoltaic storage - experiences? Tips?17
10.10.2017New photovoltaic system with storage in single-family house - experiences39
17.05.2017Photovoltaics initially without storage54
05.03.2018Photovoltaic planning - possible retrofitting of battery storage13
08.03.2018Invoice for water connection despite payment through property price?35
01.05.2021Photovoltaic system battery storage subsidy feed-in tariff?44
07.05.2020Collaboration of air-water heat pump, photovoltaic system and storage38
02.03.2020Is a photovoltaic system also sensible in the west or east?78
05.05.2020Photovoltaic system + storage with or without cloud tariff13
08.05.2020Heat pump + photovoltaic system with or without storage11
13.08.2020Is energy storage also unprofitable for electric cars? Costs of wallbox + storage79
28.03.2021Strom-Cloud experiences vs. feed-in tariff?94
04.11.2020Solar system with storage in the garage, possible?28
28.03.2022Photovoltaics are coming up - Options: 19 kWp, 25 kWp, 30 kWp, Storage?30
20.07.2022Waiving feed-in tariff, always feasible? Storage price?25
06.08.2022Saving photovoltaic system, storage, power cloud41
12.12.2022Photovoltaic offer with storage experiences?11
17.10.2023Evaluation of photovoltaic system offer with storage78
27.09.2024PV system offer including storage - Storage yes/no?44

Oben