Change of developer after construction has started?

I think what ypg means is when you come around the corner with a plot of land that acts as GÜ (and also do the planning and build the house), but also buy up plots yourself and market and develop them as a developer and ultimately hand them over to the buyer.

Yes, exactly, that’s how I understood it. I just wanted to clarify that this is not a concert of wishes for the buyer, so he can’t just choose a contract form because the construction partner is "multi-track". By the way, your post could well be pinned here in the forum. By the way, roofers and similar tradespeople are also active as developers here. It always works when you have capital (or access to it) and access to plots (aka connections).

Yes, exactly, that's how I understood it. I just wanted to clarify that this is not a buyer's wish concert, meaning he cannot just choose a contract type because the construction partner is "multitracking." By the way, your post could be pinned here in the forum.

By the way, roofers and similar are also active as developers here. It always works when you have capital (or access to it) and access to land (aka connections).

No, of course it is not a wish concert.

A builder can commission company XY as general contractor to build his house on the builder's land, then everything else will be laid down in a work contract.
The same company may also act as developer to sell someone a house with land, then a purchase contract will regulate everything.

Multitracking is nothing forbidden and not unusual either.

Regards, Yvonne

In larger "construction companies," the partners very often separate these "construction sites" legally. Then there is the ABC-Housebuilding-GmbH and the ABC-Developer-GmbH... And the ABC-Construction-Project-GmbH and the.... etc.... etc.... pp.

I have already experienced architects, engineers, construction companies that call a company which builds a house on the customer's property a developer. So don't get so worked up about it here. By now I know, we are all freaks here, discussing all kinds of small details. But if the OP wants to call the company a developer, then it is a developer. Even if it is a GÜ. This distinction is made by 0.05% of those involved in construction, for the other 99.95% it is a developer.

, sure, but it is simply relevant for answering many questions!

It makes a difference whether you are the builder yourself or not.

If I, as the builder, want to kick a trade off the construction site, then I can do that without any ifs or buts. The "real" developer, on the other hand, will kick the buyer off his construction site if he feels like it.

The contract termination with a developer becomes very expensive if it was planned individually for the customer. You yourself are kicked out of the contract, the developer would then look for a new customer and continue building - the end customer is left with costs, not to mention the loan already taken out...

But is already doing the house construction or the termination without us, otherwise he would have clarified things by now.
Regards, Yvonne