asmodii
2016-08-15 08:59:49
- #1
Now I am asking quite specifically again:
The property developer gave the impression that without a signature there will be no written (offer). So I may assume that this approach is not correct?
We told him that we want to have the contract reviewed by a lawyer. That was no surprise for him and he gave us a blank contract. He said that we can have it reviewed. He also gave us two additional forms, which represent an extension of the contract, a right of withdrawal. One in case the bank says "no" and one in case the property is gone and we have to look for a new one.
In itself, this all sounds quite trustworthy. But the offer issue somehow bothers me. You should be able to compare and have the contract reviewed before signing.
The property developer gave the impression that without a signature there will be no written (offer). So I may assume that this approach is not correct?
We told him that we want to have the contract reviewed by a lawyer. That was no surprise for him and he gave us a blank contract. He said that we can have it reviewed. He also gave us two additional forms, which represent an extension of the contract, a right of withdrawal. One in case the bank says "no" and one in case the property is gone and we have to look for a new one.
In itself, this all sounds quite trustworthy. But the offer issue somehow bothers me. You should be able to compare and have the contract reviewed before signing.