Challenge at a 1/4 circle house ;)

Question 2: Feedback on the floor plan
None

Number of parking spaces: Garage + 2 parking spaces

That's not true. He has already corrected it, s #14. No, the floor area ratio is not fixed and he is allowed two full floors.

Yeah, sounds stupid, but after years of searching, you eventually jump on something like that.
The only question is what you make of it, someone who has no children, what are they supposed to plan?
No matter what you plan, it’s just risk, I can also plan 2 children and keep 2 rooms free for years and in the end maybe not have any children. So everything is speculative.

Thank you very much

Who likes to step on the neck of a dead cow?
But please:
Where is this here first of all:

Please mark the 3 parking spaces - I am curious!

General and regarding the own design:
1. 240m² two-family house + basement for 550K never
2. with a curve for that money - even more unlikely
3. front door is on the opposite side of the parking space
4. windowless bathroom - unacceptable
5. three WCs within an area of about 15m².
6. stairs unclear - where do they arrive, where do they go, where is the way to the basement?
7. where are the other floors?
8. what does the roof cost?

Regarding the architect:
1. where is the wardrobe now?
2. lots of pointless sharp inaccessible corners. They are expensive and useless.
3. trapped dressing room without light
4. bedroom is a through room with 3(!) doors.
5. what is that supposed to be next to the WC? You can't call it a room. You can't put anything there either.
6. room in the east unused - instead a lot of area built in the south. Only 5.44m garden depth remains. Less 3m distance to the neighbor results in a maximum terrace depth of 2.44m - a table with chairs alone requires about 3.50m.
7. where are the other floors?

Aside from that, the geometry of the house is directed at best by the floor plan, plot, needs, wallet, etc. I see no reason for a detached discussion or do you want to win an architectural competition instead of living in it?

I'm afraid you got lost in the curve and it becomes an end in itself. That will be expensive tuition. Ask your architect if he knows a company that has built something like that before. Not everyone can do that. If you find someone at all, ask what he wants for the roof and the curve.

Feedback and optimizations to/on the floor plan would be illogical if someone previously said that the concept is a dead end. You don’t turn stairs or move doors on dead-end paths.

Masonry a curve is not rocket science, just sawing, but the same applies here: why continue planning its technical execution after someone has already said the sails should be set for a completely different course. For the price of the roof structure, you could almost build a house, but I don’t want to confuse anyone here with such facts.

Not only Yvonne can hardly read the height specifications, I also find them very hard to read; you have to guess. Nevertheless, I believe I have recognized that the decoratively curved brow represents a slope with partly more than 2 m height difference; that means I get the impression that property and street terrain diverge most strongly there.

It seems to me that the OP is persistently blown away by how great his 3D program can handle the "challenge," to the point that he would almost regret solving the knot now in an unspectacular, simple way by cleverly placing a normal house on the plot. Therefore, we experience more consultation resistance here than with , who now only ranks second (still unchallenged in third place is ). So I say it one last time with the last bit of patience: the curve is not the solution and should be disposed of before it becomes the problem – in this sense, it is not constructive to differentiate between the faceted curve and the arc curve or between the client’s curve and the architect’s curve. The only thing this curve does is increase the difference between "well done" and "well meant"!