Challenge at a 1/4 circle house ;)

someone who has no children, what is he supposed to plan?
No matter what you plan, it’s just risk, I can also plan 2 children and keep 2 rooms free for years and in the end maybe have no children. So everything is speculative.

Yes, that’s hard for us to say, you have to decide that yourself.

But you do have to do it at some point – at least in terms of the house. 1 children’s room, 2 or 3 – a decision has to be made and no wishy-washy stuff. As long as you don’t know what you want, you won’t get anywhere – no matter how many threads you start on the same topic.

Yes, we can hardly say that, you have to decide for yourself.

But you also have to do it sometime – at least technically. 1 children's room, 2 or 3 – a statement has to be made and no wishy-washy. As long as you don't know what you want, you won't get any further – even if you open as many threads on the same topic.

Many thanks Katja,

so then let's "review" the whole thing based on my questions:

Question 1: Rounding suggestion from post 1 or stick with the square one?
- Forget the round one, suggestion L shape

Question 2: Feedback on floor plan
None

Question 3: Optimizations XY on the floor plan

Question 4: Evaluation of architect's first draft
No, totally unacceptable

The thread should actually have gone in another direction "floor plan" i.e. room layout, but it flowed more into the house geometry.

"Still so many threads" on the same topic,

Thanks for your efforts and support
Best regards

Thank you very much Katja,

so then let's "review" the whole thing based on my questions:

Question 1: Rounding suggestion from Post 1 or sticking with the square one?
- Forget the round one, suggestion L shape

Question 2: Feedback on floor plan
None

Question 3: Optimizations XY on the floor plan

Question 4: Evaluation of architect's first draft
No, absolutely not

The thread was actually supposed to go in a different direction "floor plan" meaning room layout, but it ended up focusing more on the house geometry.

"So many threads" on the same topic,

Thanks for your efforts and support
Best regards

Again just wishy-washy.

The thread was actually supposed to go in a different direction "floor plan," meaning room layout, but it ended up focusing more on the house geometry.

ok... usually it is kept quiet and other things are leaned on in the conversation (the actual question is avoided) when it's nonsense.

in this case, one must also say that there are still 3 unknowns here:
- the heights of the plot, which no one here can read, so does that mean a slope needs to be considered?
- must it be the curve?
- what needs must the house satisfy?

then the 4th question comes to mind:

are you actually fans of this extreme building cubature so that this effort and these costs make sense, or is it just this mentioned stubborn attitude. At least from the "designs," I can read that you have no use for it whatsoever.

in addition, the plot is quite small. I would consider creating 2 residential units on it, regardless of whether it is basement or not.
If indeed yes, then please make it age-appropriate with exits and parking spaces right away.
And with this planning (mental thing and sketch) it does not really matter where the bathroom is.

Plot size: 434m2
Slope: no (or minimal)
Site coverage ratio: 0.4
Floor space index: 0.4

If that is correct, then you are only allowed to build a total of "just" 173 sqm, not once upstairs and once downstairs.

If that is true, then you are only allowed to build a total of "173 sqm," not once on the top and once on the bottom.

or 173m2 on the bottom and a penthouse floor on top with a maximum of 2/3 of the floor area below. So depending on the state building code.

If that's true

That's not true. He has already corrected it, see #14.

or below 173m2 and above a setback floor with max. 2/3 of the floor area below.

No, the floor area ratio is not fixed and he is allowed two full floors.