Benutzer200
2021-11-27 14:35:24
- #1
Then gently come to terms with the thought that your understanding is not always correct. The above is basically the introduction to real estate law. These are basics. Consider it figuratively, that the verbal agreement is essentially the offer to conclude a purchase contract, the notarization the acceptance. Of course, you could now point out that "culpa in contrahendo" might apply (§ 311 II No. 2 of the Building Code), i.e., a pre-contractual breach of duty. But what this should de facto consist of is beyond me. Conclusion: Building Code and case law up to the Federal Court of Justice are: No notary, no purchase contract, no mutual claims.From my understanding, the legal obligation to involve the notary as a "witness" does not imply that an action against the engagement kiss would be without consequences.