The only plausible legal option, provided the banks simply accept this, is a cancellation without payment of prepayment penalties. However, it should also be noted that the wording criticized by the [EuGH] was probably prescribed as a template by the legislature in the contracts. To what extent a German court would punish a bank that adhered to regulations set by the legislature appears questionable.
Furthermore, I consider the claim that one would get the paid interest back to be a bold thesis, since the economic benefit of the borrowed money was utilized. Only if the interest had been classified as usurious at the time of the conclusion would there be a claim to excessively paid interest.
In my opinion, everything else is pure client fishing.