Not quite. My point is not that the passive house is a plastic bag, but that it is an obvious legislative goal to mandate this type of house in new construction for CO2 avoidance reasons. Mandatory! I don’t care if tego, haydee, or whoever else likes it, they can build it for themselves. But to mandate it for everyone, while at the same time not banning the Touareg or BMW Six-Hundred-Pants, that’s outrageous. Our Golf with three cylinders and 110 HP reaches about 180, consumes between 5 and 7 liters, has room for 4, and CO2 around 110 g. That is perfectly sufficient.
Now then. I don’t want to mandate everyone to drive such a car. Whoever wants the Six-Hundred-Pants, go ahead. But I could live well with speed limits and a tax preference for smaller cars. I can also live well with passive houses. Just please nobody force me to live in one. It’s also about freedom and rejection of social-pedagogical legislation and nanny politics. Karsten