ruppsn
2018-01-27 20:44:37
- #1
So, opening and closing windows, everyone with a [Brettergymnasiumabi] understands that, controlling a system like that, you have to like it.
It can’t be the ultimate wisdom to equip a building with technology that only makes it habitable through that technology. But, I think here not only views but whole attitudes towards life clash. Karsten
Maybe the mistake lies exactly here. With a controlled residential ventilation system, you usually don’t have to adjust anything, even those with a [Brettergymnasiumabi] understand that much better, because they simply don’t have to do anything. And how well manual ventilation works (for [Brettergymnasiasten]) can often be seen in rental apartments that have mold because their occupants are apparently too lazy to ventilate — or don’t have the time for it (due to working). However, it’s completely fine if someone prefers to ventilate manually and can manage it (intellectually and timewise). But the technology of controlled residential ventilation is no more complex than operating a kitchen hood — even Apple fans would manage that (by the way, I like Apple a lot too, but being a fan would be too much).
Regarding the necessity of the technology. Well, if you focus on energy consumption and want to exploit as many energy reservoirs in the house as possible, you won’t get around a certain amount of technology. But it should remain manageable, and I don’t see any trend that you would need a degree to operate controlled residential ventilation or heating. Possibly for the configuration and setting, but there I agree with you. I simply have no desire to spend my free time optimizing the parameters of heating curves or air exchange rates. I’d rather live in or outside the house [emoji4]