About passive houses and plastic bags and styrofoam fur

Imagine, Marvinius, I am even somewhat religious. Certainly not quite traditionally biblically pious, but I have not lost a certain sense and taste for the infinite. Karsten

Too bad, emotional messages from a *-ISM follower again instead of a factual contribution....

Some people just can't live without a firm belief. Freedom is just difficult...

Self-reflection, I would say. Or was there any factual argument like mine? Apart from that, I think I am the one here with the least belief in anything.

I would immediately say "Stop" there. With this approach, burning oil and coal is no problem – after all, both have bound that CO2 millions of years ago, which would now be released again.

Logically correct would be, if you take your approach as a balance, that only as much should be burned as is simultaneously bound by processes elsewhere. No one would think it logical to burn today and recollect next year – what happens in the meantime?

So. I have now practically presented one of your facts as incorrect (or as unfortunately formulated).

I do not agree. There are enough buffer systems, so that you can produce carbon dioxide at point A in place B, which you reintroduce into the cycle at point D in place E.
If it were not so, you would have to tie a plant around your belly that immediately converts the CO2 you exhale back into O2...
Let's just assume that the increased CO2 content of the atmosphere accelerates plant growth in Brazil. (Satellite images do show that plant biomass is growing.) Due to the accelerated plant growth, x tons more CO2 can now be absorbed, which you (hopefully without NOX and particulate emissions) have emitted. On the way there, however, algae in the sea absorb another Y tons of CO2, so you may even emit more, namely X + Y tons...

Self-reflection, I would say. Or was there any factual argument, like mine?

Apart from that, I think I am the one here with the least belief in anything.

Sigmund Freud says that excessive defense suggests a hidden, unacknowledged longing.[emoji2] Karsten

Self-reflection, I would say. Or was there any factual argument, like with me?

Apart from that, I think I am the one here with the least belief in anything.

Just as an example:
"Butterflies 80% dead"
From what baseline? What is the cause: Maybe shredded by wind turbines?

"Polar bears are dying"
They always have, if you mean extinction: They are mixing with grizzlies, extinction is out of the question.

Factual? Maybe if you studied "Theater Studies"...

Sigmund Freud says that exaggerated defense indicates a hidden, unacknowledged longing.[emoji2] Karsten

I don’t know exactly what Freud means by that, but I definitely have it.