About passive houses and plastic bags and styrofoam fur

But that's just a tip... Maybe just an unsubstantiated argument to avoid having to rethink or even question one's own lifestyle..[emoji848]

Of course, there are always winners and losers with climate changes. The question is: Where are there more winners or losers: with warming or with cooling? My guess: With cooling, everyone loses.

As you said, the temperature rises even without humans, just more slowly. So no danger for now...

As you said, the temperature rises even without humans, just more slowly. So for now, no danger...

Kind of like with the "forest dieback"

So continue as before. After me, the flood.

But it will surely come then.

So keep going as before. After me, the flood.

But it will surely come.

Oh, is that why we build so many cruise ships? And chand1986 promised better red wine after all....

Sometimes only humor helps, especially against too much mythology....

No mythology.

First of all, the warming is certain. What one does with it and to what extent one thinks one should participate in it is the question.

One problem with warming is, among other things, that it not only makes it warmer but paradoxically can initiate the next ice age by tipping the major ocean currents. So the equation warming = good does not fundamentally apply.

Why it still should not make a difference how much emission of certain gases one strives for is still awaiting a good argument. Only when the market regulates it instead of the state, is it okay? Or how does the story go?

Or is it about the fact that all this is not so important?