Tego12
2018-01-27 18:25:02
- #1
It's just not...
Too dry air? Enthalpy heat exchangers, problem solved. For example, we have a constant 45%. And I could still vary it here if I want... (We don't have ETICS, but that doesn't change the indoor climate since the same requirements for airtightness apply).
Damage to facades? You have it on all facades. That you think it occurs more often on ETICS systems is subjective. Fraunhofer claims the opposite and says aerated concrete facades have more damage due to a significantly higher number of thermal bridges.
Regarding traffic, I completely agree with you! ETICS facades have an extremely good CO2 balance over their lifetime... From an ecological perspective, definitely sensible to insulate... That can't be an argument against it.
Too dry air? Enthalpy heat exchangers, problem solved. For example, we have a constant 45%. And I could still vary it here if I want... (We don't have ETICS, but that doesn't change the indoor climate since the same requirements for airtightness apply).
Damage to facades? You have it on all facades. That you think it occurs more often on ETICS systems is subjective. Fraunhofer claims the opposite and says aerated concrete facades have more damage due to a significantly higher number of thermal bridges.
Regarding traffic, I completely agree with you! ETICS facades have an extremely good CO2 balance over their lifetime... From an ecological perspective, definitely sensible to insulate... That can't be an argument against it.