About passive houses and plastic bags and styrofoam fur

  • Erstellt am 2018-01-26 22:22:29

kaho674

2018-01-31 13:00:41
  • #1
Sounds somehow like HansguckindieLuft. Heard the news in the last 5 years? Or did you mean it's all theater and nothing they broadcast is true? That would of course be possible. But my clean windshield on the highway in summer says otherwise.
 

Nordlys

2018-01-31 13:02:00
  • #2
With Freud, you ultimately always end up at S....[emoji4][emoji111]️. But it's difficult in passive houses. Those things easily overheat.
 

kaho674

2018-01-31 13:05:27
  • #3
And what exactly is difficult about that now?
 

Nordlys

2018-01-31 13:11:06
  • #4
Well, because of [Schmelzpunkt Plastiktüte], I thought....
 

kaho674

2018-01-31 13:16:54
  • #5
On the topic: Well, I would like to have a passive house with lots of insulation. Unfortunately, I am too poor for that. The idea of hardly using any energy excites me. Even just to stick it to the greedy energy companies.
 

chand1986

2018-01-31 13:18:37
  • #6


That is correct, nevertheless, the interval between times A and D cannot be made arbitrarily long. One should remain several orders of magnitude below the time scale on which greenhouse gases significantly contribute to the warming of the Earth by increasing the accumulated amount of energy from solar radiation. Otherwise, the buffer is irrelevant for the goal of "climate protection."



It is about the overall balance. The amount I exhale and burn here can just as well be sequestered in Brazil or New Zealand. Since we consider CO2 over the entire atmosphere when it comes to global warming, only a global balance makes sense.

The "simultaneous" in my reply to Karsten referred to a time scale that reflects climate changes. So not on the scale of seconds or days; I was unclear in my expression there.

Nevertheless, the argument of the balance cannot be applied generally over arbitrary time periods, because the millions of years between the formation and combustion of coal and oil do not do justice to the problem.



Caution with the sea. It is such an effective CO2 sink that this is not compensated by algae – not even remotely.
 
Oben