11ant
2025-02-11 15:33:37
- #1
Assuming she has only performed 28 out of 35 individual basic services, I would also only credit her linearly 4/5 in your place – then it is up to her to argue which of these were relatively more valuable, so that the linear reduction would go too far. I would offset the compensation for the scaffold that was planned for too long. Afterwards, I would pay the fee for the entire service phase to which the cost estimates belong separately to the district court, where she can collect it against handing over the required basic services. A lawyer will properly draft this for you. He will also give her a note that the reduction of the HOAI basic scope of the architect contract could not have been done unilaterally. Even as a freelancer, one cannot just pick and choose arbitrarily which parts of their contract with the client they "opt out" of providing against generous waiver of their remuneration like their least favorite subject in upper secondary school. A litigious lawyer might even use the word "fraud."She means she does not have to fulfill all services, so the lph would also be billed proportionally. [/] when I look into the hoai I feel sick at what she has not done. That would go beyond the scope here