2Bac87
2019-01-16 22:26:18
- #1
Thank you very much for the feedback.
We considered converting the dressing room into a storage room or laundry room with the storage room being converted into a dressing-through passage. But due to the limited access options with traffic area through the bathroom or bedroom, we decided against it. The wardrobe shown there is our current existing wardrobe for size relation. The later furnishing as outlined by is being aimed for.
The point about the door is a good hint. Thank you. The attempt to enlarge the storage room and thus make it usable as a sewing room failed because of the position of the bedroom window parallel to the kitchen window. The bedroom also seems too large to me, but I see no possibility for redistribution. The office on the ground floor was initially planned as children’s rooms 2 and 3 and was subsequently reduced to enlarge the living room. I will try to enlarge the office again and approach the living-dining-kitchen complex from this starting point.
Budget probably too tight. Increasing the floor space by 10 - 20 cm was suggested by the planner. This certainly gains some area but does not change structural problems and increases the budget again.
Due to my profession, I see many elderly people with minor physical ailments which in combination with the living situation (split level, upper floor & no elevator) strongly restrict their quality of life. (Not going outside because of the upper floor; toilet chair instead of WC). In my experience, a full care case cannot be cared for at home for staffing reasons. The opportunity costs for a disability-compliant layout according to the norm are too high, therefore I aimed for a compromise solution (bedroom on ground floor, wider doors, turning circle WC).
The utility room is planned tight. I am considering planning the controlled residential ventilation system in the attic, which will then be integrated into the thermal envelope. A fixed staircase there is not yet planned. We will reconsider the living-dining-kitchen and master complex.
The neighborhood is currently planned as a worst-case scenario within the limits of the development plan. Since the neighbors are still unknown, there is no information about their plans. For these reasons, I have already abandoned the originally planned double garage. The development plan does not allow a garage within the first 5 meters. A front entrance door facing the street makes us uneasy. Hence this configuration. Neither we nor the planner could think of an alternative for a nicer garden and also secondarily for the northern neighbor. The positioning of the garage complies with the development plan.
The kitchen planning was already done very early according to the wishes of the better half. The size is among other things also due to the idea of complete storage without a utility room. Due to my profession, I do not participate in most meals. The idea is that the counter is meant for breakfast, for the evening tea and for providing company for those working in the kitchen (explicitly not only my wife). Family meals are planned for the dining table.
The screen is currently planned in front of the central window on the west side. This is equipped with a parapet for the positioning of the center speaker. Detailed planning (screen size depending on seating distance) is still pending. At the moment I would find it a pity to take away the garden view from the living room.
Many thanks again for the feedback! We will consider the points and discuss them internally and with the planner. Due to my profession, I will only be able to respond in 2 days, so please do not interpret my inactivity as disinterest.
Best regards
We considered converting the dressing room into a storage room or laundry room with the storage room being converted into a dressing-through passage. But due to the limited access options with traffic area through the bathroom or bedroom, we decided against it. The wardrobe shown there is our current existing wardrobe for size relation. The later furnishing as outlined by is being aimed for.
The point about the door is a good hint. Thank you. The attempt to enlarge the storage room and thus make it usable as a sewing room failed because of the position of the bedroom window parallel to the kitchen window. The bedroom also seems too large to me, but I see no possibility for redistribution. The office on the ground floor was initially planned as children’s rooms 2 and 3 and was subsequently reduced to enlarge the living room. I will try to enlarge the office again and approach the living-dining-kitchen complex from this starting point.
Budget probably too tight. Increasing the floor space by 10 - 20 cm was suggested by the planner. This certainly gains some area but does not change structural problems and increases the budget again.
Please consider when and with what restrictions you will move downstairs.
Due to my profession, I see many elderly people with minor physical ailments which in combination with the living situation (split level, upper floor & no elevator) strongly restrict their quality of life. (Not going outside because of the upper floor; toilet chair instead of WC). In my experience, a full care case cannot be cared for at home for staffing reasons. The opportunity costs for a disability-compliant layout according to the norm are too high, therefore I aimed for a compromise solution (bedroom on ground floor, wider doors, turning circle WC).
The utility room is planned tight. I am considering planning the controlled residential ventilation system in the attic, which will then be integrated into the thermal envelope. A fixed staircase there is not yet planned. We will reconsider the living-dining-kitchen and master complex.
The neighborhood is currently planned as a worst-case scenario within the limits of the development plan. Since the neighbors are still unknown, there is no information about their plans. For these reasons, I have already abandoned the originally planned double garage. The development plan does not allow a garage within the first 5 meters. A front entrance door facing the street makes us uneasy. Hence this configuration. Neither we nor the planner could think of an alternative for a nicer garden and also secondarily for the northern neighbor. The positioning of the garage complies with the development plan.
The kitchen is very lavish
The kitchen planning was already done very early according to the wishes of the better half. The size is among other things also due to the idea of complete storage without a utility room. Due to my profession, I do not participate in most meals. The idea is that the counter is meant for breakfast, for the evening tea and for providing company for those working in the kitchen (explicitly not only my wife). Family meals are planned for the dining table.
And where will the TV, screen, i.e. home cinema, be placed?
The screen is currently planned in front of the central window on the west side. This is equipped with a parapet for the positioning of the center speaker. Detailed planning (screen size depending on seating distance) is still pending. At the moment I would find it a pity to take away the garden view from the living room.
Many thanks again for the feedback! We will consider the points and discuss them internally and with the planner. Due to my profession, I will only be able to respond in 2 days, so please do not interpret my inactivity as disinterest.
Best regards