I have a bit of a fear here that a short appraisal might come in at around €600,000, while we could probably achieve a good €650,000+ or something similar on the market through a joint sale.
On the one hand, no one can know what the current market value actually is, meaning the value you are speculating about. You also cannot know whether the house might have a big loss on sale somewhere that you do not see. It can be a gem on the real estate market for oneself, but for others an average property with defects that is negotiated down. For a family of four, the layout might not fit, for the solvent and demanding couple the equipment is not suitable. For the one it fits, it is too expensive or the financing is stuck.
so that I can still get the maximum value for myself in a payout from you?
Phew, usually most people (at least those I know and who were in the same situation) rather care that something at all is possible. Then an imbalance or compromise or personal sacrifices of €20,000/30,000 quickly come within reach as the optimum. The saying usually applies: better a bird in the hand than a pigeon on the roof. For both!
Especially when it comes to money, the fun or patience eventually runs out. And you or you should look at it realistically: the more you demand, the less likely it is that she can pay you out and pay the remaining installments to the bank alone.
Then the sale might come into play after all, and experienced interested buyers can smell a forced sale.
Then some time will pass because a small "power struggle" can arise between the property owner and potential buyers.
I’ll tell you how we (ex-husband and I) did it back then (that was a long time ago, so values were much lower). However, I am just skimming through the beginning of the thread again and the situation was similar to yours back then.
But: the possible and smooth solution will not please you!
I (woman) had a somewhat lower income than my husband. Both of us contributed the same amount of equity to the financing (each €20,000), I officially received an interest-free loan of €50,000 from my parents (exactly because my father wanted to get his money back in case of separation). Actually, all that was in 1999 in Deutsche Mark, but that confuses when reading.
€250,000 loan. Equity on both sides during renovation from ongoing salary.
Selling after 5 years would have been an economic loss due to early repayment fees and the real estate slump.
Goal for everyone: as little loss as possible for both, feasibility through a fair reality check.
Fact: I kept the house because the €50,000 to my father did not have to be repaid.
He got his €20,000 back without interest. What he paid monthly into the installments is to be seen as equivalent to rent, which he would have paid otherwise, just like the renovation (which was manageable in terms of amount).
I bear the risk of the remaining financing without further claims against him. He is taken off the land register. He then gets an automatic pre-emptive right to the house.
What would have happened if there had been no real estate slump? If a profit had been expected?
Sale? No. Early repayment fees and the father loan would have brought everything back to zero or a small loss.
More payout to my ex? No. Probably exactly the same or a few thousand more. Certainly not 50% of the difference to the fictitious gain. And why not? Because I then could not have borne it alone. We would have gone around in circles dealing with the problem without solving it with our set goal.
And now you come with personal profit maximization. .