Sell the house or keep it alone in case of a theoretical divorce?

  • Erstellt am 2024-09-26 13:57:39

nordanney

2025-01-10 10:38:44
  • #1
He already wrote "everything is legally settled". So this important issue has already been addressed.
 

MachsSelbst

2025-01-10 13:11:55
  • #2
Then... I don’t understand again what there is left to clarify. The financial side is ultimately a very straightforward matter, there are no emotions involved either from the expert or the potential buyer. It is assessed what the house is worth, who has already invested how much or brought into the marriage. And then it is divided, either by mutual agreement or by the judge. Since no children are involved, it really is an absolutely clear-cut matter in the end. What ideas could there be that the divorce lawyer doesn’t know, that would set you up even better?

Make sure you get it over with quickly and don’t waste time trying to find the absolute optimum. That will not exist anyway.
 

Juergen456

2025-01-10 13:36:04
  • #3


Yes, I understand what you mean, but sometimes there are indeed things from other/personal experiences to consider in order to optimize the whole thing for oneself.
 

Joedreck

2025-01-10 14:10:26
  • #4
Hi, I am actually a silent reader...

Personally, I would conclude a separation and divorce consequences agreement. In this, one can also notarize transfers, division of the household, and a possible house handover including payments. Likewise, a potential pension equalization. And I would probably aim for this as soon as possible, because once all financial and material matters are settled, new partners and similar circumstances can no longer have an influence.
 

Arauki11

2025-01-10 15:21:57
  • #5
That's right. Take your time. When people and thus emotions are involved, reason doesn't always work that easily. You can always see it better in others, almost everyone fails with themselves. I once read in a good book that you can also fail your way to a good result.
 
Oben