Bauexperte
2012-08-24 19:32:22
- #1
Hello Matthias,
You have it in writing, so your builder owes you a KfW 70 efficiency house!
What exactly is meant by "lamination"?
That would be the easiest option; whether it makes sense is another question.
If I understand correctly, you are currently preparing the building application. You are building with Poroton – what speaks against using a filled brick? Then you should also be able to save the 7%, and for your builder it would cost almost the same.
You can also install a ventilation system with heat recovery, which should also bring the missing percentage points.
The most sensible thing would be, however, to discuss the new building project with a TGA planner and see where losses can be avoided and which technology should reasonably be used; a structural engineer is usually overwhelmed at this point.
Kind regards
The house we planned was guaranteed to us by the builder as a KFW 70 house. However, there are difficulties in achieving this standard.
You have it in writing, so your builder owes you a KfW 70 efficiency house!
He has already included the following measures:
- Thermal insulation with WLG 032 and lamination
- 10cm base insulation and lamination in the floor
- Windows with Ug-value 0.5
- Individual calculation of thermal bridges
What exactly is meant by "lamination"?
His proposal now is to use an air heat pump to achieve the missing percentage points. At the moment, I am not very enthusiastic about this and would like to avoid it.
That would be the easiest option; whether it makes sense is another question.
If I understand correctly, you are currently preparing the building application. You are building with Poroton – what speaks against using a filled brick? Then you should also be able to save the 7%, and for your builder it would cost almost the same.
You can also install a ventilation system with heat recovery, which should also bring the missing percentage points.
The most sensible thing would be, however, to discuss the new building project with a TGA planner and see where losses can be avoided and which technology should reasonably be used; a structural engineer is usually overwhelmed at this point.
Kind regards