EL is very individual to assess and is perceived individually as well.
- Resilience
- Time factor
- Skills
- Quality
- Realizable savings potentials
- Family conflict potentials
- Division of leisure/profession/construction
For one person it fits. For another, it does not.
EL and scope are purely individual. There is no recipe for it – except that one should not set it too high.
Concrete example: I did not deliver my EL in the agreed scope.
Because a) I would have needed significantly more time and b) in many parts it would not have turned out qualitatively that good, I would have done it (because it was technically / craft-wise too difficult / too complicated for me). I recognized this and the break-even through accelerating the construction project (= reducing costs of double burden of transitional apartment (expensive) + furniture storage (expensive)) was clearly demonstrable. So I reduced my EL, then sensibly assigned trades to professionals and good companies, with whom I also agreed that I could help and what I then do would be credited. I think I was able to save around 5-7K this way. Especially with work that any fool can do. EL work and time effort over 8 months was already enough (for me personally). I was satisfied with the savings, that was the sensibly achievable.
Another building family XY (fictional) with a larger circle of acquaintances and a different distribution of the factors mentioned at the beginning would have said: Let’s do it casually, saves 15K euros. Besides, we don’t care, we have no double burden, we still live at grandma’s. So we save even more, time factor is no problem at all for us. Where would the problem be then? Exactly: none at all.
The thread originally was also about what is sensible to state at the bank. And for that there is neither a checklist nor a recipe. It goes wrong with self-overestimation. And as said, one can quickly calculate some break-even oneself.
Overall, however, accumulating wealth through EL savings is an incredibly difficult matter.
Best regards Thorsten